02-007 · EVIDENCE A · SOURCE-SENSITIVE
Not drinking sugary drinks — even switching to sugar-free ones doesn’t help
不喝含糖饮料,换成无糖的也不算解决
There’s no cost involved, nor does it take any extra time. Switching to plain water or sugar-free tea can even save money. The real challenge is breaking the habit of drinking sweet beverages, including sugar-free ones.
People who drink more than two sugary drinks per day have about a 20% higher chance of dying during the same period compared to those who rarely drink them. Those who consume one to two per day still face a roughly 10% higher risk. Switching to sugar-free versions brings no benefit: individuals drinking two or more sugar-free drinks daily actually have a 25% higher risk of death.
A
Move “Not drinking sugary drinks — even switching to sugar-free ones doesn’t help” to Future Me's calendar
The excuse
One more exception feels free because the bill arrives outside the current scene.
What feels good now
Today I keep a few minutes, a bit of persistence and avoid interrupting my default routine.
What the source says
The source summarizes the return this way: “People who drink more than two sugary drinks per day have about a 20% higher chance of dying during the same period compared to those who rarely drink them. Those who consume one to two per day still face a roughly 10% higher risk. Switching to sugar-free versions brings no benefit: individuals drinking two or more sugar-free drinks daily actually have a 25% higher risk of death.” Evidence grade A. The original states the population, caveats, and sources; this is not a personal forecast.
Use the original facts and limits. For an urgent medical, safety, financial, or legal issue, contact a qualified local professional or service.
THE ENGLISH EDITION
Original recommendation and evidence
7. Not drinking sugary drinks — even switching to sugar-free ones doesn’t help
Cost: There’s no cost involved, nor does it take any extra time. Switching to plain water or sugar-free tea can even save money. The real challenge is breaking the habit of drinking sweet beverages, including sugar-free ones.
In plain terms: People who drink more than two sugary drinks per day have about a 20% higher chance of dying during the same period compared to those who rarely drink them. Those who consume one to two per day still face a roughly 10% higher risk. Switching to sugar-free versions brings no benefit: individuals drinking two or more sugar-free drinks daily actually have a 25% higher risk of death.
Benefit: Two large U.S. studies followed large groups of people without any subgroup categorization; together they included around 118,000 participants and documented 36,000 deaths. Those drinking two or more sugary drinks daily had a 21% higher risk of death compared to those consuming less than one per month (HR 1.21). For those drinking one to two per day, the risk rose by about 14% (HR 1.14). The European EPIC study followed 450,000 people across 10 countries under similar conditions; again no subgroups were defined. Compared to those drinking less than one sugary drink per month, daily consumers of two or more sugary drinks faced an 8% higher risk (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01–1.16). Those drinking two or more sugar-free drinks daily had a 26% higher risk (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.16–1.35). When all types of soft drinks were considered together, the risk increase was about 17% (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.11–1.22).
Evidence grade: A
Sources: Malik VS et al. (2019). Long-Term Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages and Risk of Mortality in US Adults. Circulation. <https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037401>; Mullee A, Romaguera D, Pearson-Stuttard J, et al. (2019). Association Between Soft Drink Consumption and Mortality in 10 European Countries. JAMA Internal Medicine, 179(11), 1479-1490. <https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2478>
Notes: There is ongoing debate regarding sugar-free drinks. The association between sugar-free drinks and health outcomes appears even stronger than that of sugary drinks, which likely reflects reverse causality: individuals who are already overweight or have diabetes tend to switch to sugar-free versions. Therefore, we cannot claim sugar-free drinks are more harmful based on this alone. Nevertheless, this evidence clearly shows that the idea “switching to sugar-free drinks solves the problem” lacks any factual support. The safest choice remains plain water or sugar-free tea. Additionally, these studies rely solely on observational tracking rather than controlled trials; people who consume more sugary drinks often lead less healthy lifestyles overall, which may contribute to the observed higher risk figures.
Source links
- Malik VS 等 (2019). Long-Term Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages and Risk of Mortality in US Adults. Circulation. ↗
- Mullee A, Romaguera D, Pearson-Stuttard J, et al. (2019). Association Between Soft Drink Consumption and Mortality in 10 European Countries. JAMA Internal Medicine, 179(11), 1479-1490. ↗
- Pinned original chapter on GitHub ↗
Read the complete Chinese source and notes
7. 不喝含糖饮料,换成无糖的也不算解决
成本: 不花钱,也不占时间。换成白水或无糖茶还省钱。难在要改掉喝甜饮料的习惯,包括无糖的。
说人话: 每天喝两瓶以上甜饮料的人,同期死亡的概率比几乎不喝的人高约两成。每天一到两瓶的,也高一成多。换成无糖的也没见着好处:每天喝两杯以上代糖饮料的人,反而高约四分之一。
收益: 美国有两项跟踪一群人的大型研究。这两项只记录、不分组,约 11.8 万人、3.6 万例死亡。每天喝 2 份以上的人,死亡风险比每月不到 1 份的人高约 21%(HR 1.21)。每天喝 1–2 份的,高约 14%(HR 1.14)。欧洲 EPIC 跟踪研究只记录、不分组,有 45 万人、10 个国家。每天喝 2 杯以上的人和每月不到 1 杯的人比:含糖软饮这项高约 8%(HR 1.08,95% CI 1.01–1.16)。人工甜味剂饮料(无糖版)高约 26%(HR 1.26,1.16–1.35)。所有软饮合起来算,高约 17%(HR 1.17,1.11–1.22)。
证据等级: A
来源: Malik VS 等 (2019). Long-Term Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages and Risk of Mortality in US Adults. Circulation. <https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037401>;Mullee A, Romaguera D, Pearson-Stuttard J, et al. (2019). Association Between Soft Drink Consumption and Mortality in 10 European Countries. JAMA Internal Medicine, 179(11), 1479-1490. <https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2478>
备注: 争议在无糖饮料上。代糖饮料的关联反而比含糖的更强,这很可能是因果反过来了:已经超重或者得了糖尿病的人,才改喝无糖版。所以别据此说代糖更毒。但它至少说明,「换成无糖就没事」这个说法没有证据支持。换成白水或者无糖茶最稳妥。另外,这类研究只是跟踪记录,没做分组试验,喝甜饮料多的人本来生活方式就更差,所以数字可能偏大。
YOUR PRIVATE LIST