02-010 · EVIDENCE B · SOURCE-SENSITIVE
Brush teeth thoroughly and floss daily; replace missing teeth promptly
认真刷牙,每天清一次牙缝,缺牙及时补
Dental floss or interdental brushes cost just a few dozen yuan per year, while professional cleanings run about 100–200 yuan each. It takes only two to three extra minutes per day. The real challenge is making flossing a daily habit.
People who floss daily have roughly a 10% lower chance of dying over the same period. For elderly individuals with no natural teeth, the risk of death is about 90% higher. Those with fewer than 20 natural teeth face roughly double the risk.
B
Move “Brush teeth thoroughly and floss daily; replace missing teeth promptly” to Future Me's calendar
The excuse
There is no immediate alarm, so the sensible choice can wait for a less busy week.
What feels good now
Today I keep a little money, a few minutes, a bit of persistence and avoid interrupting my default routine.
What the source says
The source summarizes the return this way: “People who floss daily have roughly a 10% lower chance of dying over the same period. For elderly individuals with no natural teeth, the risk of death is about 90% higher. Those with fewer than 20 natural teeth face roughly double the risk.” Evidence grade B. The original states the population, caveats, and sources; this is not a personal forecast.
Use the original facts and limits. For an urgent medical, safety, financial, or legal issue, contact a qualified local professional or service.
THE ENGLISH EDITION
Original recommendation and evidence
10. Brush teeth thoroughly and floss daily; replace missing teeth promptly
Cost: Dental floss or interdental brushes cost just a few dozen yuan per year, while professional cleanings run about 100–200 yuan each. It takes only two to three extra minutes per day. The real challenge is making flossing a daily habit.
In plain terms: People who floss daily have roughly a 10% lower chance of dying over the same period. For elderly individuals with no natural teeth, the risk of death is about 90% higher. Those with fewer than 20 natural teeth face roughly double the risk.
Benefit: A Japanese study followed 9,676 participants for six years. Those who used interdental cleaning tools saw their mortality risk drop by about 11% (hazard ratio 0.89). Those who used tongue cleaners saw a 23% reduction (HR 0.77). When multiple studies of community-dwelling seniors are combined, people with no natural teeth have roughly 1.87 times the risk of death (95% CI 1.35–2.59). Those with fewer than 20 natural teeth face about 2.04 times the risk (95% CI 1.67–2.49).
Evidence grade: B
Sources: Wang K, Matsuyama Y, Kiuchi S, et al. (2026). Routine oral health practices and all-cause mortality. Journal of Dentistry. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2026.106789>; Ko MJ, Seo S, So JS, et al. (2026). Deteriorated oral health and function as risk factors for physical disability and mortality in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Geriatric Medicine. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01319-4>
Notes: This topic remains debated. These studies are purely observational; individuals with poor dental health often also have poorer overall health and lower socioeconomic status. It is unclear whether poor dental health harms overall health or whether poor health leads to poor dental health. Regardless, the cost of proper dental care is very low, and periodontal disease and missing teeth do directly affect eating ability.
Source links
- Wang K, Matsuyama Y, Kiuchi S, et al. (2026). Routine oral health practices and all-cause mortality. Journal of Dentistry. ↗
- Ko MJ, Seo S, So JS, et al. (2026). Deteriorated oral health and function as risk factors for physical disability and mortality in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Geriatric Medicine. ↗
- Yaacob M, Worthington HV, Deacon SA, et al. (2014). Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ↗
- Deacon SA, Glenny AM, Deery C, et al. (2010). Different powered toothbrushes for plaque control and gingival health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ↗
- Pinned original chapter on GitHub ↗
Read the complete Chinese source and notes
10. 认真刷牙,每天清一次牙缝,缺牙及时补
成本: 牙线或牙缝刷一年几十元,洗牙每次一两百元。每天多花两三分钟。难在要把清牙缝变成每天都做的事。手动牙刷刷不干净的,可以换电动牙刷,一支几百元,刷头要定期换。
说人话: 每天用牙线或牙缝刷的人,同期死亡的概率低约一成。牙掉光的老人,死亡的概率高约九成。剩不到 20 颗牙的,高约一倍。电动牙刷比手动刷多去掉一到两成牙菌斑,牙龈发炎也轻一些,但这点差别有多大用还说不清。
收益: 日本有一项研究,9676 人,跟踪 6 年。用牙缝清洁工具的人,死亡风险低约 11%(风险比 0.89)。用舌苔清洁工具的人,低约 23%(0.77)。另外把多项研究合起来算,对象是住在社区的老人。一颗牙都没有的人,死亡的机会约为 1.87 倍(比值比,95% CI 1.35–2.59,这是可信范围)。牙齿少于 20 颗的,约为 2.04 倍(1.67–2.49)。电动和手动比:把 51 项随机试验合起来算,用 1 到 3 个月,电动刷的牙菌斑少约 11%,3 个月以上少约 21%。牙龈炎分别轻约 6% 和 11%。综述作者说,这些差别对健康有多重要还不清楚
证据等级: B
来源: Wang K, Matsuyama Y, Kiuchi S, et al. (2026). Routine oral health practices and all-cause mortality. Journal of Dentistry. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2026.106789>;Ko MJ, Seo S, So JS, et al. (2026). Deteriorated oral health and function as risk factors for physical disability and mortality in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Geriatric Medicine. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01319-4>;Yaacob M, Worthington HV, Deacon SA, et al. (2014). Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. <https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002281.pub3>;Deacon SA, Glenny AM, Deery C, et al. (2010). Different powered toothbrushes for plaque control and gingival health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. <https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004971.pub2>
备注: 争议。这类研究只是跟踪记录。牙不好的人,往往整体健康和经济状况也差。到底是牙拖累了身体,还是身体不好连累了牙,说不清。但这件事成本极低,而且牙周炎和缺牙本身就影响吃东西。电动牙刷里,刷头来回转动的圆头试验最多,和手动刷比的效果最确定。不同类型的电动牙刷之间谁更好,独立综述因为试验太少,没下结论。种一颗牙要花多少、看牙哪些项目医保报,见第 24 节第 12 条(种牙之前先问清包干价)
YOUR PRIVATE LIST