03-020 · EVIDENCE A · LOW-RISK READING
Don’t make “how others are doing” a daily habit: set limits on apps that show peers’ updates or turn them off
别把「别人过得怎么样」当每日必读:给刷同龄人动态的应用设限或关掉
This costs nothing. Setting time limits or deactivating an account takes just a few minutes. The real challenge is resisting the urge to open these apps again later on.
People who habitually compare themselves to others online tend to feel worse emotionally and have lower self‑esteem. Pooled clinical findings show a consistent correlation between upward social comparison and poorer psychological outcomes. Correlation does not equal causation, but randomized trials back this link: after four weeks without Facebook, participants reported a slight rise in happiness. Another study limited three major platforms to 10 minutes per day; after three weeks, loneliness and depression both declined. The trade‑off? Knowledge of current events also dropped during those four weeks of abstinence.
A
Move “Don’t make “how others are doing” a daily habit: set limits on apps that show peers’ updates or turn them off” to Future Me's calendar
The excuse
If I do not open the notes, no new task has technically appeared.
What feels good now
Today I keep a few minutes, a bit of persistence and avoid interrupting my default routine.
What the source says
The source summarizes the return this way: “People who habitually compare themselves to others online tend to feel worse emotionally and have lower self‑esteem. Pooled clinical findings show a consistent correlation between upward social comparison and poorer psychological outcomes. Correlation does not equal causation, but randomized trials back this link: after four weeks without Facebook, participants reported a slight rise in happiness. Another study limited three major platforms to 10 minutes per day; after three weeks, loneliness and depression both declined. The trade‑off? Knowledge of current events also dropped during those four weeks of abstinence.” Evidence grade A. The original states the population, caveats, and sources; this is not a personal forecast.
Open the original entry, check who the evidence applies to, then pick one small step that fits.
THE ENGLISH EDITION
Original recommendation and evidence
20. Don’t make “how others are doing” a daily habit: set limits on apps that show peers’ updates or turn them off
Cost: This costs nothing. Setting time limits or deactivating an account takes just a few minutes. The real challenge is resisting the urge to open these apps again later on.
In plain terms: People who habitually compare themselves to others online tend to feel worse emotionally and have lower self‑esteem. Pooled clinical findings show a consistent correlation between upward social comparison and poorer psychological outcomes. Correlation does not equal causation, but randomized trials back this link: after four weeks without Facebook, participants reported a slight rise in happiness. Another study limited three major platforms to 10 minutes per day; after three weeks, loneliness and depression both declined. The trade‑off? Knowledge of current events also dropped during those four weeks of abstinence.
Benefit: The combined results of 54 independent studies — 94 effect sizes and a total N of 36,583 — analyzed via a three‑level random‑effects model reveal that upward social comparison correlates with poorer mental health (average r = 0.330, 95% CI 0.289–0.370). Specific effects include higher fear of negative evaluation (r = 0.438), anxiety (0.382), depression (0.306), lower happiness (0.268) and lower self‑esteem (0.263). Life satisfaction increased by 0.12 standard deviations, while happiness rose by 0.08 standard deviations. Age, cultural background and data collection year do not alter this link. In a randomized trial of 2,743 U.S. Facebook users, 61% would accept a four‑week suspension at a cost of under $102; those in the suspension group gained 0.09 standard deviations in overall life satisfaction. Compared with typical psychological interventions (which raise happiness by ~0.34 SD and cut depression by ~0.23 SD), this effect is roughly 25–40% of that magnitude. After the trial ended, former suspension users still spent 0.31 fewer standard deviations per day on Facebook. Even after the trial ended, former suspension users still spent 12 fewer minutes per day on Facebook. A smaller trial of 143 college students showed similar benefits after limiting three platforms to 10 minutes daily. Additionally, knowledge of current affairs declined by 0.19 standard deviations, and political polarization fell by 0.16 standard deviations as a result of reduced app usage.
Evidence grade: A
Sources: Lei Y, Hu S, Sun Y, Zheng L (2026). "Looking up" linked to feeling down: a meta-analysis of online upward social comparison and psychological maladjustment. Frontiers in Psychology. <https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1825169>; Allcott H, Braghieri L, Eichmeyer S, Gentzkow M (2020). Welfare Effects of Social Media. American Economic Review, 110(3), 629–676. <https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190658>; Allcott H, Braghieri L, Eichmeyer S, Gentzkow M (2019). The Welfare Effects of Social Media. NBER Working Paper No. 25514 (The specific numbers quoted in this article are verified verbatim in this edition, and the published abstract does not include numbers). <https://www.nber.org/papers/w25514>; Hunt MG, Marx R, Lipson C, Young J (2018). No More FOMO: Limiting Social Media Decreases Loneliness and Depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 37(10), 751–768. <https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2018.37.10.751>
Notes: The correlation findings merely indicate that these patterns tend to appear together; they do not prove causation. The randomized trials do suggest causal links, but they involve U.S. participants prior to the 2018 midterm elections, so applying the results directly to Chinese users is a stretch. The undergraduate trial involved only 143 subjects, limiting its statistical power. Overall effect sizes remain modest, so cutting off these apps alone will not resolve all emotional issues. This advice targets usage aimed at monitoring how others are faring; it does not apply to staying in touch with family, seeking information or job hunting. If strict limits prove hard to maintain, start by disabling push notifications, “people you may know” suggestions and homepage recommendations. For broader screen‑time management, see sections 4.15 and 4.16 (hard caps on short‑video apps and scrolling news). When feeling down, consider the actions outlined in section 19 (exercise, sunlight and regular sleep). For those seeking identity through purchases, see section 6.23; those striving to “move up a social rung” should review section 6.24.
Source links
- Lei Y, Hu S, Sun Y, Zheng L (2026). "Looking up" linked to feeling down: a meta-analysis of online upward social comparison and psychological maladjustment. Frontiers in Psychology. ↗
- Allcott H, Braghieri L, Eichmeyer S, Gentzkow M (2020). The Welfare Effects of Social Media. American Economic Review, 110(3), 629–676. ↗
- Allcott H, Braghieri L, Eichmeyer S, Gentzkow M (2019). The Welfare Effects of Social Media. NBER Working Paper No. 25514(本条引用的具体数字按这一版逐字核对,刊出版的摘要不含数字). ↗
- Hunt MG, Marx R, Lipson C, Young J (2018). No More FOMO: Limiting Social Media Decreases Loneliness and Depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 37(10), 751–768. ↗
- Pinned original chapter on GitHub ↗
Read the complete Chinese source and notes
20. 别把「别人过得怎么样」当每日必读:给刷同龄人动态的应用设限或关掉
成本: 不花钱。给应用设限时,或者把账号停掉,都是几分钟的事。难的是之后不再打开,要长期对抗惯性。
说人话: 习惯在网上跟过得更好的人比的人,往往情绪更差、自尊更低。把 Facebook 停用四周的人,幸福感小幅提高,但对时事的了解也掉了一截。把三个社交平台各限到每天 10 分钟的人,三周后孤独和抑郁都降了下来。
收益: 把多项研究合起来算(荟萃分析):54 个独立样本、94 个效应量、N = 36,583,用的是三层随机效应模型。网上向上社会比较与心理适应不良的平均相关 r = 0.330(95% CI 0.289–0.370,可信范围)。按具体结果分开看。怕被人看轻这类社会评价性的负面情绪 0.438,焦虑 0.382。抑郁 0.306,幸福感偏低 0.268,自尊偏低 0.263。年龄、文化背景、数据采集年份都不影响这个关联的强弱。长期跟踪的研究得出的结果,也不比同一时间点的调查更强。另有一项随机分组的对照试验,受试者是 2,743 名美国 Facebook 用户。其中 61% 的人愿意以低于 102 美元接受停用。这些人被随机分为停用四周组与对照组。停用为普通受试者每天空出 60 分钟。主观幸福感指数提高 0.09 个标准差。分项是生活满意度 0.12、焦虑 0.10、抑郁 0.09、快乐 0.08。把多次比较碰巧的成分扣掉后,这些仍然算数。作者给了一个参照,是让人变积极的心理干预。这类干预对主观幸福感约 +0.34 个标准差,对抑郁约 -0.23 个标准差。所以这个效应约为常规心理干预的 25% 到 40%。同期的代价是:时事知识指数下降 0.19 个标准差,政治立场对立程度下降 0.16 个标准差。实验结束后,停用组的 Facebook 使用仍比对照低 12 分钟/天(0.31 个标准差,降幅 23%)。还有一项随机分组的对照试验,受试者是 143 名本科生,被随机分成两组。一组把 Facebook、Instagram、Snapchat 每个平台每天限 10 分钟,另一组照常使用。三周后,限时组的孤独与抑郁明显下降。两组的焦虑与错失恐惧都比一开始低。
证据等级: A
来源: Lei Y, Hu S, Sun Y, Zheng L (2026). "Looking up" linked to feeling down: a meta-analysis of online upward social comparison and psychological maladjustment. Frontiers in Psychology. <https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1825169>;Allcott H, Braghieri L, Eichmeyer S, Gentzkow M (2020). The Welfare Effects of Social Media. American Economic Review, 110(3), 629–676. <https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190658>;Allcott H, Braghieri L, Eichmeyer S, Gentzkow M (2019). The Welfare Effects of Social Media. NBER Working Paper No. 25514(本条引用的具体数字按这一版逐字核对,刊出版的摘要不含数字). <https://www.nber.org/papers/w25514>;Hunt MG, Marx R, Lipson C, Young J (2018). No More FOMO: Limiting Social Media Decreases Loneliness and Depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 37(10), 751–768. <https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2018.37.10.751>
备注: 「相关」那一半只说明两件事一起出现,不能读成谁导致谁,作者自己也说还需要更多长期跟踪的研究。随机分组那一半能说因果,但受试者是 2018 年美国中期选举前的 Facebook 用户,搬到中国的平台上属于硬套。Hunt 那项只有 143 名本科生,而且就这一项。效应量都不大,别指望关掉应用就能解决情绪问题。要拦的是「看别人过得怎么样」这一类使用,和家人朋友联系、查信息、找工作不在内。真按不住,就先从关推送、关「可能认识的人」和首页推荐入手。总屏幕时间的账见第 4 节第 15、16 条(短视频硬上限、不看滚动新闻)。情绪低落时先做什么,见本节第 18 条(动起来、晒太阳、按时睡)。靠买东西找回身份感见第 6 节第 23 条。为了「往上挪一档」多花钱见第 6 节第 24 条。
YOUR PRIVATE LIST