06-002 · EVIDENCE A · SOURCE-SENSITIVE
Don’t take regular fish oil capsules to prevent heart disease
不要为了预防心血管病吃普通鱼油
It costs roughly 1 to 3 yuan per day, or 400 to 1000 yuan per year. Taking it requires no extra time at all.
Two large trials enrolled 26000 and 15000 people with diabetes respectively. For those who took 1 gram of fish oil daily, the rates of major cardiovascular events and death were identical to those who did not take it. The fact that eating fish is beneficial does not mean fish oil capsules are equally helpful. Skipping them saves you 400 to 1000 yuan each year.
A
Move “Don’t take regular fish oil capsules to prevent heart disease” to Future Me's calendar
The excuse
If I do not open the notes, no new task has technically appeared.
What feels good now
Today I keep a few minutes and avoid interrupting my default routine.
What the source says
The source summarizes the return this way: “Two large trials enrolled 26000 and 15000 people with diabetes respectively. For those who took 1 gram of fish oil daily, the rates of major cardiovascular events and death were identical to those who did not take it. The fact that eating fish is beneficial does not mean fish oil capsules are equally helpful. Skipping them saves you 400 to 1000 yuan each year.” Evidence grade A. The original states the population, caveats, and sources; this is not a personal forecast.
Use the original facts and limits. For an urgent medical, safety, financial, or legal issue, contact a qualified local professional or service.
THE ENGLISH EDITION
Original recommendation and evidence
2. Don’t take regular fish oil capsules to prevent heart disease
Cost: It costs roughly 1 to 3 yuan per day, or 400 to 1000 yuan per year. Taking it requires no extra time at all.
In plain terms: Two large trials enrolled 26000 and 15000 people with diabetes respectively. For those who took 1 gram of fish oil daily, the rates of major cardiovascular events and death were identical to those who did not take it. The fact that eating fish is beneficial does not mean fish oil capsules are equally helpful. Skipping them saves you 400 to 1000 yuan each year.
Benefit: The VITAL trial included 25871 participants who took 1 gram of fish oil daily for a median follow-up of 5.3 years. No difference emerged between groups in terms of major cardiovascular events or death. The hazard ratio for major cardiovascular events was 0.92 (a hazard ratio of 1 indicates no difference); its 95% confidence interval of 0.80–1.06 also confirms no meaningful difference. The hazard ratio for all-cause death was 1.02 (0.90–1.15). The ASCEND trial involved 15480 diabetic patients who took the same daily dose for an average of 7.4 years, and again no significant differences were observed: the relative risk for serious vascular events was 0.97 (0.87–1.08) and for all-cause death it was 0.95 (0.86–1.05). The perception that fish oil is worthwhile stems from many people mistakenly equating the health benefits of eating fish with those of fish oil capsules.
Evidence grade: A
Sources: Manson JE et al. (2019). Marine n-3 Fatty Acid Supplements and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer. NEJM. <https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1811403>; ASCEND Study Collaborative Group (2018). <https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1804989>; Bhatt DL et al. (2019). Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia. New England Journal of Medicine. <https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1812792> (note the high-purity prescription fish oil trial)
Notes: Controversy: One trial did produce positive results. The REDUCE-IT trial enrolled 8179 participants with existing cardiovascular disease or diabetes, who were already taking statins and had elevated triglyceride levels (135–499 mg/dL). They took 4 grams of prescription-grade pure EPA daily, which lowered their risk of adverse events to 17.2% from 22.0%. This represents roughly a quarter reduction in risk (hazard ratio 0.75, 0.68–0.83). However, this was a high-dose prescription medication given to high-risk patients, not ordinary over-the-counter fish oil supplements. Eating fish itself is not covered by these findings.
Source links
- Manson JE et al. (2019). Marine n-3 Fatty Acids and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer. NEJM. ↗
- ASCEND Study Collaborative Group (2018). Effects of n-3 Fatty Acid Supplements in Diabetes Mellitus. NEJM. ↗
- Bhatt DL 等 (2019). Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia. New England Journal of Medicine. ↗
- Pinned original chapter on GitHub ↗
Read the complete Chinese source and notes
2. 不要为了预防心血管病吃普通鱼油
成本: 一天约 1 到 3 元,一年 400 到 1000 元。吃它不费时间。
说人话: 两项大试验分别找了 2.6 万人和 1.5 万名糖尿病患者。每天吃 1 克鱼油的人,心脏血管出大事的、死掉的,都和不吃的一样多。「吃鱼有好处」不等于「吃鱼油胶囊有好处」。不买能省下一年四百到一千块。
收益: VITAL 试验找了 25,871 人,每天吃 1 克鱼油,跟踪了 5.3 年(中位数)。心脏血管出大事和死亡,两边都没看出差别。主要心血管事件 HR 0.92(HR 是风险比,1 就是两边一个样)。95% CI 0.80–1.06 是这个数的可信范围。它跨过了 1,说明看不出差别。全因死亡 HR 1.02(0.90–1.15)。ASCEND 试验找了 15,480 名糖尿病患者,也是每天 1 克,平均跟踪 7.4 年,同样没看出差别。严重血管事件 RR 0.97(0.87–1.08)。全因死亡 RR 0.95(0.86–1.05)。它看起来划算,是因为很多人把「吃鱼有好处」直接当成了「吃鱼油胶囊有好处」
证据等级: A
来源: Manson JE et al. (2019). Marine n-3 Fatty Acids and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer. NEJM. <https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1811403>;ASCEND Study Collaborative Group (2018). Effects of n-3 Fatty Acid Supplements in Diabetes Mellitus. NEJM. <https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1804989>;Bhatt DL 等 (2019). Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia. New England Journal of Medicine. <https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1812792>(备注里那项高纯度处方鱼油试验)
备注: 争议:有一项试验是有效的。REDUCE-IT 试验找了 8,179 人,他们本来就有心血管病或糖尿病,都在吃他汀,甘油三酯还偏高(135–499 mg/dL)。他们每天吃 4 g 纯 EPA 的处方药,出事的比例 17.2% 对 22.0%。风险低约四分之一(HR 0.75,0.68–0.83)。但那是给高危病人开的大剂量处方药,不等于普通人吃保健品鱼油。这里说的也不包括吃鱼本身
YOUR PRIVATE LIST