08-013 · EVIDENCE A · SOURCE-SENSITIVE
No matter how angry you are, never target innocent people: deliberately driving into a crowd or committing violence in public is classified as endangering public safety by dangerous means, carrying a minimum sentence of three years; if anyone dies, the penalty is death.
再恨也别对不相干的人下手:驾车冲撞人群、在公共场所行凶按以危险方法危害公共安全定罪,起刑三年,死了人十年起步、最高死刑
There is no monetary cost involved. The real challenge is suppressing such impulses when you’re enraged.
Intentionally driving into a crowd or attacking people in public constitutes endangering public safety by dangerous means. Even if no one is injured, the offender still faces at least three years in prison. If fatalities occur, the sentence rises to ten years or more, life imprisonment, or death. In the Zhuhai case, Fan Weiqiu, dissatisfied with the divorce settlement, drove his car into a crowd exercising at a sports center, resulting in 35 deaths and 43 injuries; he was sentenced to death and executed.
A
Move “No matter how angry you are, never target innocent people: deliberately driving into a crowd or committing violence in public is classified as endangering public safety by dangerous means, carrying a minimum sentence of three years; if anyone dies, the penalty is death.” to Future Me's calendar
The excuse
One more exception feels free because the bill arrives outside the current scene.
What feels good now
Today I keep a few minutes, a bit of persistence and avoid interrupting my default routine.
What the source says
The source summarizes the return this way: “Intentionally driving into a crowd or attacking people in public constitutes endangering public safety by dangerous means. Even if no one is injured, the offender still faces at least three years in prison. If fatalities occur, the sentence rises to ten years or more, life imprisonment, or death. In the Zhuhai case, Fan Weiqiu, dissatisfied with the divorce settlement, drove his car into a crowd exercising at a sports center, resulting in 35 deaths and 43 injuries; he was sentenced to death and executed.” Evidence grade A. The original states the population, caveats, and sources; this is not a personal forecast.
Use the original facts and limits. For an urgent medical, safety, financial, or legal issue, contact a qualified local professional or service.
THE ENGLISH EDITION
Original recommendation and evidence
13. No matter how angry you are, never target innocent people: deliberately driving into a crowd or committing violence in public is classified as endangering public safety by dangerous means, carrying a minimum sentence of three years; if anyone dies, the penalty is death.
Cost: There is no monetary cost involved. The real challenge is suppressing such impulses when you’re enraged.
In plain terms: Intentionally driving into a crowd or attacking people in public constitutes endangering public safety by dangerous means. Even if no one is injured, the offender still faces at least three years in prison. If fatalities occur, the sentence rises to ten years or more, life imprisonment, or death. In the Zhuhai case, Fan Weiqiu, dissatisfied with the divorce settlement, drove his car into a crowd exercising at a sports center, resulting in 35 deaths and 43 injuries; he was sentenced to death and executed.
Benefit: Article 114 of the Criminal Law states: “Whoever commits arson, breaches a dike, causes an explosion, releases toxic, radioactive, or infectious agents, or endangers public safety by any other dangerous means, without causing serious consequences, shall be sentenced to three to ten years in prison.” Thus, even when no injuries occur, the minimum penalty is three years. Article 115 adds that if serious injury, death, or major property damage results, the sentence becomes ten years or more, life imprisonment, or death. Official case example: Fan Weiqiu, disillusioned by his failed marriage and unhappy with the divorce terms, resolved to vent his anger by driving into a crowd. On the evening of November 11, 2024, he crashed his vehicle into exercisers at Zhuhai Sports Center, killing 35 and injuring 43. He was convicted under the aforementioned article and sentenced to death, with political rights revoked; the sentence was carried out on January 20, 2025 after Supreme Court approval. His grievance pertained solely to the divorce ruling; his victims were completely unrelated runners from across the country.
Evidence grade: A
Sources: National People's Congress (1997). Criminal Law (Articles 114, 115). <https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/fl/201802/t20180206_364975.shtml>; <http://www.news.cn/20241112/29c6af4f6ee4455b92832f3c2b13a93a/c.html> (Reported to the Zhuhai Municipal Public Security Bureau); Supreme People's Procuratorate of China (2024). Fan Weiqiu was sentenced to death in the first instance of the case of endangering public safety by dangerous means and deprived of political rights for life. <https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/zdgz/202412/t20241227_677757.shtml>; Supreme People's Procuratorate of China (2025). Fan Weiqiu, the criminal in the Zhuhai driving collision case, was executed. <https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/zdgz/202501/t20250120_680196.shtml>; Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (2025). Public Security Management Punishment Law (revised in 2025, Articles 29, 50). <https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/fl/202506/t20250627_699863.shtml>
Notes: Expressing thoughts like “I don’t want to live anyway” does not serve as a mitigating factor in sentencing. The Supreme People’s Court’s 2025 work report emphasizes “resolutely punishing with severity, speed, and strictness those who outrageously violate legal and moral boundaries.” Merely threatening to commit acts such as arson, explosions, or poisoning that endanger public safety and disrupt order can lead to detention from five to ten days and a fine of up to 1000 yuan under the Public Security Administration Punishment Law (effective January 1, 2026). Similarly, sending threatening letters or otherwise endangering another’s safety is illegal, punishable by up to five days’ detention or a similar fine. Anyone entertaining such ideas should refer to item 14, which treats notions like “finding a scapegoat” as a medical emergency requiring immediate intervention.
Read the complete Chinese source and notes
13. 再恨也别对不相干的人下手:驾车冲撞人群、在公共场所行凶按以危险方法危害公共安全定罪,起刑三年,死了人十年起步、最高死刑
成本: 不花钱。难在气头上把这个念头压住。
说人话: 驾车冲撞人群、在公共场所行凶,按以危险方法危害公共安全定罪。一个人都没伤着,也是三年起。死了人就是十年以上、无期或者死刑。珠海那起:樊维秋不满离婚财产分割,开车冲进体育中心正在锻炼的人群,致 35 死 43 伤,判死刑并已执行。
收益: 刑法第一百一十四条:「放火、决水、爆炸以及投放毒害性、放射性、传染病病原体等物质或者以其他危险方法危害公共安全,尚未造成严重后果的,处三年以上十年以下有期徒刑」。一个人都没伤着,也是三年起。第一百一十五条:致人重伤、死亡,或者使公私财产遭受重大损失的,处十年以上有期徒刑、无期徒刑或者死刑。官方案例:樊维秋因为婚姻破裂、生活失意,又不满离婚财产分割的结果,「决意通过驾车冲撞人群方式发泄私愤」。2024 年 11 月 11 日晚,他驾车冲入珠海市体育中心正在锻炼的人群,致 35 人死亡、43 人受伤。一审以以危险方法危害公共安全罪判处死刑、剥夺政治权利终身,2025 年 1 月 20 日经最高人民法院核准执行。被撞的是他不认识的跑步者(全国)
证据等级: A
来源: 全国人大 (1997). 刑法(第一百一十四、一百一十五条). <https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/fl/201802/t20180206_364975.shtml>;新华社 (2024). 广东珠海驾车撞人事件造成 35 人死亡 43 人受伤. <http://www.news.cn/20241112/29c6af4f6ee4455b92832f3c2b13a93a/c.html>(转珠海市公安局通报);最高人民检察院 (2024). 樊维秋以危险方法危害公共安全案一审宣判,判处死刑,剥夺政治权利终身. <https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/zdgz/202412/t20241227_677757.shtml>;最高人民检察院 (2025). 珠海驾车撞人案罪犯樊维秋被执行死刑. <https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/zdgz/202501/t20250120_680196.shtml>;全国人大常委会 (2025). 治安管理处罚法(2025 年修订,第二十九、五十条). <https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/fl/202506/t20250627_699863.shtml>
备注: 「反正我也不想活了」在量刑上不是折扣。最高人民法院 2025 年工作报告对这类案件的口径是「对挑战法律和道德底线的罪大恶极者,坚决依法从严从重从快惩处」。只是放话也已经违法。放话要放火、爆炸、投毒这类危害公共安全的事,把公共秩序搅乱了的,拘留 5 到 10 日,还可以罚 1000 元以下。写恐吓信,或者用别的办法威胁别人人身安全,同样违法。这种要拘留 5 日以下,或者罚 1000 元以下(治安管理处罚法 2026 年 1 月 1 日起施行)。念头已经到这一步的,看第 14 条(冒出「拉个垫背的」这种念头当急症处理)。
YOUR PRIVATE LIST