11-003 · EVIDENCE A · SOURCE-SENSITIVE

Do not write or sell scripts for ticket snatching, flash sales, fake orders, or coupon farming — even if they merely “automate button clicks”

不写、不卖抢票、秒杀、刷单、薅羊毛脚本,哪怕只是「自动化点按钮」

Source cost

No expense and no time required

Source return

Even if a script does not modify memory or bypass security measures and merely sends requests faster than a human can, it still qualifies as illegal acquisition of computer system data. The legal threshold is either earning over 5,000 yuan or causing at least 10,000 yuan in losses. One individual bought multiple 12306 accounts and used them to snatch over 200 train tickets, netting more than 20,000 yuan; he was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months in prison, suspended for the same period, plus a fine of 5,000 yuan. Another person sold ticket‑snatching software online and was found guilty of unfair competition, ordered to pay 20,000 yuan in damages.

Evidence grade

A

THE LOW-ROI DETOURSatire, not advice

Move “Do not write or sell scripts for ticket snatching, flash sales, fake orders, or coupon farming — even if they merely “automate button clicks”” to Future Me's calendar

The excuse

The routine already works until the day the source says it may not.

What feels good now

Today I keep a few minutes and avoid interrupting my default routine.

What the source says

The source summarizes the return this way: “Even if a script does not modify memory or bypass security measures and merely sends requests faster than a human can, it still qualifies as illegal acquisition of computer system data. The legal threshold is either earning over 5,000 yuan or causing at least 10,000 yuan in losses. One individual bought multiple 12306 accounts and used them to snatch over 200 train tickets, netting more than 20,000 yuan; he was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months in prison, suspended for the same period, plus a fine of 5,000 yuan. Another person sold ticket‑snatching software online and was found guilty of unfair competition, ordered to pay 20,000 yuan in damages.” Evidence grade A. The original states the population, caveats, and sources; this is not a personal forecast.

THE ENGLISH EDITION

Original recommendation and evidence

Source commit a994b6a0c905

3. Do not write or sell scripts for ticket snatching, flash sales, fake orders, or coupon farming — even if they merely “automate button clicks”

Cost: No expense and no time required

In plain terms: Even if a script does not modify memory or bypass security measures and merely sends requests faster than a human can, it still qualifies as illegal acquisition of computer system data. The legal threshold is either earning over 5,000 yuan or causing at least 10,000 yuan in losses. One individual bought multiple 12306 accounts and used them to snatch over 200 train tickets, netting more than 20,000 yuan; he was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months in prison, suspended for the same period, plus a fine of 5,000 yuan. Another person sold ticket‑snatching software online and was found guilty of unfair competition, ordered to pay 20,000 yuan in damages.

Benefit: Illegally accessing computer systems or obtaining their data via any technical means can lead to imprisonment of up to 3 years, a fine, or both; more serious cases incur 3–7 years in prison. The threshold for “serious circumstances” is earning over 5,000 yuan illegally or causing losses exceeding 10,000 yuan. Official cases include a person who used a bot to submit numerous ticket‑purchase requests using purchased 12306 accounts; he snatched more than 200 tickets and earned over 20,000 yuan, resulting in the same sentence as above. Zheng sold ticket‑snatching software for a specific booking app and was ordered to pay 20,000 yuan for unfair competition (national precedent).

Evidence grade: A

Sources: National People's Congress (2020). Criminal Law (Amended in accordance with the Criminal Law Amendment (11), Article 285, Paragraph 2). <https://jtgl.beijing.gov.cn/jgj/jgxx/flfg/fl/11033925/index.html>; Supreme People's Court of China, Supreme People's Procuratorate of China (2011). Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in Handling Criminal Cases Endangering the Security of Computer Information Systems (Article 1). <https://ga.sz.gov.cn/ZWGK/ZCFG/ZCJD/content/post_1304363.html>; Supreme People's Procuratorate of China (2026). Shanghai Jing'an: Investigate the case of using plug-in software to rob train tickets in batches for profit. <https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/dfjcdt/202607/t20260707_731426.shtml>; Supreme People's Court of China (2025). Typical intellectual property cases of the People's Court in 2024 (Case 7, unfair competition case of ticket grabbing software). <https://enipc.court.gov.cn/zh-cn/news/view-4205.html>

Notes: Even scripts that do not alter memory or bypass security and merely operate faster than humans still fall under Article 285 of the Criminal Law. Both paid ticket‑snatching services and selling such scripts are considered profit‑generating activities. No official cases have been reported for individuals using such scripts solely for personal use.

Read the complete Chinese source and notes

3. 不写、不卖抢票、秒杀、刷单、薅羊毛脚本,哪怕只是「自动化点按钮」

成本: 不花钱,也不占时间

说人话: 脚本不改内存、不破解,只是发请求比人快,一样会被定罪,挣到 5000 元或让对方损失 1 万元就够。有人用买来的 12306 账号代抢 200 多张票、挣了 2 万多,判 1 年 6 个月缓 1 年 6 个月、罚 5000 元。在网店卖抢票软件的,按不正当竞争赔了 2 万元。

收益: 侵入计算机信息系统,或者用其他技术手段拿到里面的数据,情节严重的判 3 年以下,并处或单处罚金,特别严重的判 3 到 7 年。「情节严重」的门槛是违法所得 5000 元以上,或者造成损失 1 万元以上。官方案例:某人用外挂批量导入买来的 12306 账号,多线程密集提交购票请求。他代抢火车票 200 余张,获利 2 万余元。法院以非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪,判他 1 年 6 个月缓 1 年 6 个月、罚 5000 元。郑某在网店卖针对某售票 App 的抢票软件,被判构成不正当竞争,赔 2 万元(全国)

证据等级: A

来源: 全国人大 (2020). 刑法(根据刑法修正案(十一)修正,第二百八十五条第二款). <https://jtgl.beijing.gov.cn/jgj/jgxx/flfg/fl/11033925/index.html>;最高人民法院、最高人民检察院 (2011). 关于办理危害计算机信息系统安全刑事案件应用法律若干问题的解释(第一条). <https://ga.sz.gov.cn/ZWGK/ZCFG/ZCJD/content/post_1304363.html>;最高人民检察院 (2026). 上海静安:查办利用外挂软件批量代抢火车票牟利案. <https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/dfjcdt/202607/t20260707_731426.shtml>;最高人民法院 (2025). 2024 年人民法院知识产权典型案例(案例七,抢票软件不正当竞争案). <https://enipc.court.gov.cn/zh-cn/news/view-4205.html>

备注: 抢票案里的脚本不改内存、不破解,只是「比人快」,仍然按刑法 285 条定罪。收钱代抢和卖脚本都算牟利。自己用一次的情形,没有找到官方案例。

Author's scope notes: 抢票案里的脚本不改内存、不破解,只是「比人快」,仍然按刑法 285 条定罪。收钱代抢和卖脚本都算牟利。自己用一次的情形,没有找到官方案例。

YOUR PRIVATE LIST

Choose what to do with this idea

Original content by eternity4719 under CC BY 4.0. English translation is credited in the source notes. HowToLiveWorse adds a clearly labeled satirical response.

Full source and adaptation notes