11-004 · EVIDENCE A · SOURCE-SENSITIVE

The crawler only accesses publicly available pages that require no login; it does not attempt to bypass anti-scraping measures or handle any personal information, and any data it collects is never sold.

爬虫只爬无需登录的公开页面,不绕反爬、不碰个人信息,爬到的数据不卖

Source cost

No cost at all. A crawler is simply a program that automatically browses web pages and extracts the data on them. Before running one, check the robots.txt file and any API authorization guidelines — robots.txt is a file placed by website owners in their root directory that lists pages they do not want crawlers to access. Any data that requires a login, a token (a temporary access credential), or signature decryption to obtain is not targeted. The real challenge is resisting the temptation to collect such data even when technical means make it easy to do so — this depends entirely on self-discipline.

Source return

Any data that requires a login, a token, or signature decryption to access falls under bypassing protective measures; violations are punishable by up to 3 years in prison, or 3 to 7 years in more serious cases. Collecting personal information brings even heavier penalties. Possessing 50 or more records related to personal movement, communications, credit history, or financial information is already considered a serious offense. The same applies if you collect 500 or more records on accommodation, health, or transaction details, 5000 or more records of other types, or earn 5000 yuan or more from such activities.

Evidence grade

A

THE LOW-ROI DETOURSatire, not advice

Move “The crawler only accesses publicly available pages that require no login; it does not attempt to bypass anti-scraping measures or handle any personal information, and any data it collects is never sold.” to Future Me's calendar

The excuse

There is no immediate alarm, so the sensible choice can wait for a less busy week.

What feels good now

Today I keep a few minutes, a bit of persistence and avoid interrupting my default routine.

What the source says

The source summarizes the return this way: “Any data that requires a login, a token, or signature decryption to access falls under bypassing protective measures; violations are punishable by up to 3 years in prison, or 3 to 7 years in more serious cases. Collecting personal information brings even heavier penalties. Possessing 50 or more records related to personal movement, communications, credit history, or financial information is already considered a serious offense. The same applies if you collect 500 or more records on accommodation, health, or transaction details, 5000 or more records of other types, or earn 5000 yuan or more from such activities.” Evidence grade A. The original states the population, caveats, and sources; this is not a personal forecast.

THE ENGLISH EDITION

Original recommendation and evidence

Source commit a994b6a0c905

4. The crawler only accesses publicly available pages that require no login; it does not attempt to bypass anti-scraping measures or handle any personal information, and any data it collects is never sold.

Cost: No cost at all. A crawler is simply a program that automatically browses web pages and extracts the data on them. Before running one, check the robots.txt file and any API authorization guidelines — robots.txt is a file placed by website owners in their root directory that lists pages they do not want crawlers to access. Any data that requires a login, a token (a temporary access credential), or signature decryption to obtain is not targeted. The real challenge is resisting the temptation to collect such data even when technical means make it easy to do so — this depends entirely on self-discipline.

In plain terms: Any data that requires a login, a token, or signature decryption to access falls under bypassing protective measures; violations are punishable by up to 3 years in prison, or 3 to 7 years in more serious cases. Collecting personal information brings even heavier penalties. Possessing 50 or more records related to personal movement, communications, credit history, or financial information is already considered a serious offense. The same applies if you collect 500 or more records on accommodation, health, or transaction details, 5000 or more records of other types, or earn 5000 yuan or more from such activities.

Benefit: Illegally accessing system data by bypassing protective measures carries the same sentencing range as the third item (scripts used for ticket scalping or flash sale fraud): up to 3 years in prison, or 3 to 7 years in more serious cases. Illegally obtaining, selling, or providing citizens’ personal information also triggers heavy penalties if any of the following thresholds are met: 50 or more records on personal movement, communications, credit history, or financial details; 500 or more records on accommodation, communications, health, or transaction information; 5000 or more records of other types; or illegal earnings of 5000 yuan or more. Serious violations result in up to 3 years in prison, plus a fine or fine alone; extremely serious cases are punished with 3 to 7 years in prison. A real-world example: software developer Li used a feature disguised as a “face beauty detection” tool to steal 1751 facial photos from users’ phone albums, then sold data from a social engineering database he had compiled — he was sentenced to 3 years in prison, suspended for 3 years. A social engineering database is a collection of personal information leaked from various sources. Another case: an internet technology firm used a crawler to harvest store and order data from a food delivery platform, causing over 40,000 yuan in losses; it was prosecuted for illegally obtaining data from a computer information system (this case is documented nationwide).

Evidence grade: A

Sources: National People's Congress (2020). Criminal Law (Amended in accordance with the Criminal Law Amendment (11), Article 285, Paragraph 2, Article 253-1). <https://jtgl.beijing.gov.cn/jgj/jgxx/flfg/fl/11033925/index.html>; Supreme People's Court of China, Supreme People's Procuratorate of China (2017). Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in Handling Criminal Cases of Infringement of Citizens' Personal Information (Articles 3, 4, and 5). <https://www.spp.gov.cn/xwfbh/wsfbt/201705/t20170509_190088.shtml>; Supreme People's Procuratorate of China (2022). Typical cases of procuratorial organs punishing crimes of infringement of citizens' personal information in accordance with the law (Case 2). <https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/xwfbh/wsfbt/202212/t20221207_594915.shtml>; Supreme People's Procuratorate of China (2025). Procuratorates punish crimes that infringe on corporate data security in accordance with the law and provide services to ensure corporate innovation and development (Case 1). <https://www.spp.gov.cn/xwfbh/wsfbh/202501/t20250124_680670.shtml>

Notes: A 2017 judicial interpretation states that “providing information lawfully collected from others without their consent” also counts as “providing personal information” under the law. This provision also applies to companies that share user databases with external partners. 5000 records is roughly the size of a small database table.

Read the complete Chinese source and notes

4. 爬虫只爬无需登录的公开页面,不绕反爬、不碰个人信息,爬到的数据不卖

成本: 不花钱。爬虫就是自动翻网页、把上面的数据抓下来的程序。爬之前先看一眼 robots 文件和接口授权说明,robots 是网站放在自己根目录、写明哪些页面不让抓的那份文件。要登录、要 token(一串临时通行凭证)、要破解签名才拿得到的数据,不爬。难在这些数据技术上一抓就到手,忍住全靠自觉

说人话: 要登录、要 token、要破解签名才拿得到的数据,属于绕过防护,判 3 年以下,严重的判 3 到 7 年。爬到个人信息更麻烦。行踪、通信、征信、财产类 50 条,就算情节严重。住宿、健康、交易类 500 条,其他类 5000 条,或者挣到 5000 元,也一样。

收益: 绕过防护拿系统里的数据,量刑和第 3 条(抢票秒杀刷单脚本)一样,判 3 年以下,或者 3 到 7 年。非法获取、出售或者提供公民个人信息,达到下面任何一条就算「情节严重」:行踪轨迹、通信内容、征信、财产信息 50 条以上;住宿、通信记录、健康、交易信息 500 条以上;其他个人信息 5000 条以上;违法所得 5000 元以上。情节严重的判 3 年以下,并处或单处罚金,特别严重的判 3 到 7 年。官方案例:软件开发人员李某把窃取手机相册的功能伪装成「颜值检测」软件,拿到人脸照片 1751 张,还倒卖社工库资料,判 3 年缓 3 年。社工库就是把各处泄露的个人信息汇总起来的数据库。某网络科技公司用爬虫拿外卖平台的店铺、订单数据,造成损失 4 万余元,被以非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪追诉(全国)

证据等级: A

来源: 全国人大 (2020). 刑法(根据刑法修正案(十一)修正,第二百八十五条第二款、第二百五十三条之一). <https://jtgl.beijing.gov.cn/jgj/jgxx/flfg/fl/11033925/index.html>;最高人民法院、最高人民检察院 (2017). 关于办理侵犯公民个人信息刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释(第三、四、五条). <https://www.spp.gov.cn/xwfbh/wsfbt/201705/t20170509_190088.shtml>;最高人民检察院 (2022). 检察机关依法惩治侵犯公民个人信息犯罪典型案例(案例二). <https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/xwfbh/wsfbt/202212/t20221207_594915.shtml>;最高人民检察院 (2025). 检察机关依法惩治侵害企业数据安全犯罪 服务保障企业创新发展(案例一). <https://www.spp.gov.cn/xwfbh/wsfbh/202501/t20250124_680670.shtml>

备注: 2017 年那份司法解释规定,「未经本人同意,把合法收集来的信息给别人」也算「提供」。公司里把用户表导给外部合作方,同样落在这句里。5000 条只是一张小表的量。

Author's scope notes: 2017 年那份司法解释规定,「未经本人同意,把合法收集来的信息给别人」也算「提供」。公司里把用户表导给外部合作方,同样落在这句里。5000 条只是一张小表的量。

YOUR PRIVATE LIST

Choose what to do with this idea

Original content by eternity4719 under CC BY 4.0. English translation is credited in the source notes. HowToLiveWorse adds a clearly labeled satirical response.

Full source and adaptation notes