11-014 · EVIDENCE B · SOURCE-SENSITIVE
Using open-source code such as GPL in products: Open-source it per the license or switch licenses — don’t treat this as “no one cares”
用 GPL 等开源代码做产品,按许可证要求开源或换许可证,不当「没人管」
There is no cost involved. Before using someone else’s open-source code, check its license for any stated usage terms. The GPL family of licenses requires that any product built using it must also have its source code released, which conflicts with selling the product as closed-source software for profit. If such a conflict exists, you must switch to another license. The hard part is giving up a library you’ve already grown comfortable using.
Copyright infringement requires you to compensate the copyright holder based on their actual losses or the profits you earned from the infringement. If you commit infringement intentionally and under aggravating circumstances, you may be ordered to pay damages ranging from 1 to 5 times the original amount. One company hired a former employee of a competitor and developed software that was substantially similar to the competitor’s product. The company argued that since the competitor’s software used GPLv2, it was required to be open-source anyway. The Supreme People’s Court ruled that whether a developer complies with GPLv2 or not has no bearing on their copyright rights, and ordered the company to cease infringement and pay 500,000 yuan in damages.
B
Move “Using open-source code such as GPL in products: Open-source it per the license or switch licenses — don’t treat this as “no one cares”” to Future Me's calendar
The excuse
I can spend longer deciding whether to start than the small action would take.
What feels good now
Today I keep a few minutes, a bit of persistence and avoid interrupting my default routine.
What the source says
The source summarizes the return this way: “Copyright infringement requires you to compensate the copyright holder based on their actual losses or the profits you earned from the infringement. If you commit infringement intentionally and under aggravating circumstances, you may be ordered to pay damages ranging from 1 to 5 times the original amount. One company hired a former employee of a competitor and developed software that was substantially similar to the competitor’s product. The company argued that since the competitor’s software used GPLv2, it was required to be open-source anyway. The Supreme People’s Court ruled that whether a developer complies with GPLv2 or not has no bearing on their copyright rights, and ordered the company to cease infringement and pay 500,000 yuan in damages.” Evidence grade B. The original states the population, caveats, and sources; this is not a personal forecast.
Use the original facts and limits. For an urgent medical, safety, financial, or legal issue, contact a qualified local professional or service.
THE ENGLISH EDITION
Original recommendation and evidence
14. Using open-source code such as GPL in products: Open-source it per the license or switch licenses — don’t treat this as “no one cares”
Cost: There is no cost involved. Before using someone else’s open-source code, check its license for any stated usage terms. The GPL family of licenses requires that any product built using it must also have its source code released, which conflicts with selling the product as closed-source software for profit. If such a conflict exists, you must switch to another license. The hard part is giving up a library you’ve already grown comfortable using.
In plain terms: Copyright infringement requires you to compensate the copyright holder based on their actual losses or the profits you earned from the infringement. If you commit infringement intentionally and under aggravating circumstances, you may be ordered to pay damages ranging from 1 to 5 times the original amount. One company hired a former employee of a competitor and developed software that was substantially similar to the competitor’s product. The company argued that since the competitor’s software used GPLv2, it was required to be open-source anyway. The Supreme People’s Court ruled that whether a developer complies with GPLv2 or not has no bearing on their copyright rights, and ordered the company to cease infringement and pay 500,000 yuan in damages.
Benefit: Copyright infringement demands compensation based on the rights holder’s actual losses or the infringer’s profits. If neither of these can be accurately calculated, damages are determined by how much it would cost to obtain a proper license for the same software. Intentional and aggravated infringement can also result in 1 to 5 times the standard compensation amount. If the infringement harms public interests, any illegal profits may be confiscated and fines imposed. A relevant official case is Supreme People’s Court Civil Appeal No. 51 of 2021. In this case, a defendant hired a former employee of a plaintiff and developed gateway software that was substantially similar to the plaintiff’s product. The defendant claimed the plaintiff’s software used GPLv2 and thus should have been open-source. The Supreme People’s Court reiterated that compliance with GPLv2 and copyright ownership are two separate issues, and ordered the defendant to cease infringement and pay 500,000 yuan in damages nationwide.
Evidence grade: B
Sources: Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (2020). Copyright Law (2020 Amendment, Articles 53, 54). <http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c2/c30834/202011/t20201119_308796.html>; Supreme People's Court of China Intellectual Property Court (2022). Case involving copyright infringement of "open source software" ((2021) Supreme People's Court Zhiminzhong No. 51). <https://ipc.court.gov.cn/zh-cn/news/view-3042.html>
Notes: This case makes it clear that “the other party used GPL code” cannot serve as justification for copying their software. Conversely, there are already effective court rulings in China where GPL authors successfully sue commercial entities that fail to release source code. No original text of these rulings could be found on the Supreme People’s Court website, so they are not cited here. This item is graded B because compliance with open-source licenses is governed only by general contract and copyright laws, without any specific legal provisions dedicated to this area.
Read the complete Chinese source and notes
14. 用 GPL 等开源代码做产品,按许可证要求开源或换许可证,不当「没人管」
成本: 不花钱。用别人的开源代码之前,看一眼它的许可证(作者写明的使用条件)。GPL 这一系要求用了它的产品也得把源码开出来,和闭源卖钱冲突,冲突就换一个。难在舍掉一个已经用顺手的库
说人话: 侵犯著作权,按对方的损失或你挣到的钱赔,故意且情节严重的,能判到 1 到 5 倍。有家公司招了对手的前员工,做出实质相似的软件,辩称对方软件用了 GPLv2、本该开源。最高法认为对方开不开源不影响它的著作权,照样判停止侵害、赔 50 万元。
收益: 侵犯著作权,按权利人的实际损失赔,或者按侵权人挣到的钱赔。这两样都算不清的,参照正常买这份授权要付多少钱来定。故意侵权并且情节严重的,可以判 1 到 5 倍赔偿。损害公共利益的,还可以没收违法所得并处罚款。官方案例:(2021)最高法知民终 51 号。被告招聘了原告的前员工,开发出的网关软件与原告软件实质相似。被告抗辩说,原告软件基于 GPLv2、本来就该开源。最高法认定「开发者自身是否违反 GPLv2 协议和是否享有软件著作权是两个独立问题」,判停止侵害、赔偿 50 万元(全国)
证据等级: B
来源: 全国人大常委会 (2020). 著作权法(2020 年修正,第五十三、五十四条). <http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c2/c30834/202011/t20201119_308796.html>;最高人民法院知识产权法庭 (2022). 涉「开源软件」著作权侵权案((2021)最高法知民终 51 号). <https://ipc.court.gov.cn/zh-cn/news/view-3042.html>
备注: 这个案子说明,「对方用了 GPL 代码」不能当成你抄它的理由。反过来,GPL 作者起诉不开源的商用方,在国内已经有生效判决,本节未在最高法官网找到原文,所以不引。定 B 级是因为守不守开源许可证,只能靠合同和著作权法里的通用规定管,没有一条专门的法条。
YOUR PRIVATE LIST