14-007 · EVIDENCE A · SOURCE-SENSITIVE

Don’t tap “Allow all” just to use an app: the data isn’t mandatory, and refusing to share it won’t block service access

别为了用 App 点「全部同意」:不是必需的信息,你不同意也不能拒绝给你服务

Source cost

No cost involved. The hard part is resisting the urge to tap “Allow all.”

Source return

Apps request your data. If that data isn’t strictly necessary to deliver the service, the app can’t deny you access just because you refuse to share it. It may only collect what it actually needs. For instance, a map app needs your location, but a flashlight app has no business asking for your contacts list.

Evidence grade

A

THE LOW-ROI DETOURSatire, not advice

Move “Don’t tap “Allow all” just to use an app: the data isn’t mandatory, and refusing to share it won’t block service access” to Future Me's calendar

The excuse

One more exception feels free because the bill arrives outside the current scene.

What feels good now

Today I keep a few minutes, a bit of persistence and avoid interrupting my default routine.

What the source says

The source summarizes the return this way: “Apps request your data. If that data isn’t strictly necessary to deliver the service, the app can’t deny you access just because you refuse to share it. It may only collect what it actually needs. For instance, a map app needs your location, but a flashlight app has no business asking for your contacts list.” Evidence grade A. The original states the population, caveats, and sources; this is not a personal forecast.

THE ENGLISH EDITION

Original recommendation and evidence

Source commit a994b6a0c905

7. Don’t tap “Allow all” just to use an app: the data isn’t mandatory, and refusing to share it won’t block service access

Cost: No cost involved. The hard part is resisting the urge to tap “Allow all.”

In plain terms: Apps request your data. If that data isn’t strictly necessary to deliver the service, the app can’t deny you access just because you refuse to share it. It may only collect what it actually needs. For instance, a map app needs your location, but a flashlight app has no business asking for your contacts list.

Benefit: Two key legal points apply here. First, providers may not deny products or services on the grounds that a user hasn’t consented or has withdrawn consent — unless processing that data is genuinely essential to delivering the service. Second, data collection must stay limited to what’s absolutely required for the intended purpose; only the minimal amount needed may be gathered.

Evidence grade: A

Notes: The deciding factor is simple: is this data truly essential to providing the service? Location data is essential for a map app, but contact lists aren’t needed for a flashlight app. After installing an app, head to your phone’s settings under app permissions and turn off any nonessential permissions. Grant access only when you genuinely need them, and even then, limit it to a one-time permission.

Sources: National People's Congress Standing Committee (2021). Personal Information Protection Law. China National People's Congress. <http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c2/c30834/202108/t20210820_313088.html>: Article 6 "The collection of personal information should be limited to the minimum scope to achieve the purpose of processing, and no excessive collection of personal information"; Article 16 "Personal information processors shall not refuse to provide products or services on the grounds that individuals do not agree to the processing of their personal information or withdraw their consent; unless the processing of personal information is necessary to provide products or services"; Article 15 "Where personal information is processed based on individual consent, individuals have the right to withdraw their consent. Personal information processors should provide a convenient way to withdraw consent."

Read the complete Chinese source and notes

7. 别为了用 App 点「全部同意」:不是必需的信息,你不同意也不能拒绝给你服务

成本: 不花钱。难的是要忍住不点「全部同意」。

说人话: App 要你的信息,如果不是提供这项服务必须用的,你不同意给,它不能因此不让你用。它能收的,也只限于用得着的那些。地图要你的位置是必须的,手电筒要你的通讯录就不是。

收益: 法律明写了两条。一是不得以个人不同意、或者撤回同意为由,拒绝提供产品或者服务;处理这些信息属于提供服务所必需的除外。二是收集应当限于实现处理目的的最小范围,只能收用得着的那些

证据等级: A

来源: 全国人大常委会 (2021). 个人信息保护法. 中国人大网. <http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c2/c30834/202108/t20210820_313088.html>:第六条「收集个人信息,应当限于实现处理目的的最小范围,不得过度收集个人信息」;第十六条「个人信息处理者不得以个人不同意处理其个人信息或者撤回同意为由,拒绝提供产品或者服务;处理个人信息属于提供产品或者服务所必需的除外」;第十五条「基于个人同意处理个人信息的,个人有权撤回其同意。个人信息处理者应当提供便捷的撤回同意的方式」

备注: 判断标准是这项信息是不是提供这个服务所必需的。地图要位置是必需的,手电筒要通讯录不是。App 装完,先到手机设置里的应用权限页,把不必需的权限关掉。等真用到的时候,再选只这一次允许。

Author's scope notes: 判断标准是这项信息是不是提供这个服务所必需的。地图要位置是必需的,手电筒要通讯录不是。App 装完,先到手机设置里的应用权限页,把不必需的权限关掉。等真用到的时候,再选只这一次允许。

YOUR PRIVATE LIST

Choose what to do with this idea

Original content by eternity4719 under CC BY 4.0. English translation is credited in the source notes. HowToLiveWorse adds a clearly labeled satirical response.

Full source and adaptation notes