26-009 · EVIDENCE A · SOURCE-SENSITIVE

Respond promptly to infringement notices; restore content after 15 days if no response

接到侵权通知要及时处理,转送声明后 15 日没有下文就恢复

Source cost

No cost involved. You must establish a fixed workflow: receive the notice, forward it to the seller, collect the seller’s defense arguments, and publicly disclose the final outcome. All steps must be documented.

Source return

If someone sends you an infringement notice with preliminary evidence, you must promptly delete, block, or remove the relevant content and forward the notice to the seller. Failing to act in time means you and the seller will be jointly liable for any additional losses incurred. After receiving the seller’s defense, forward it to the claimant and wait 15 days. If the claimant files no complaint or lawsuit during this period, you can restore the content.

Evidence grade

A

THE LOW-ROI DETOURSatire, not advice

Move “Respond promptly to infringement notices; restore content after 15 days if no response” to Future Me's calendar

The excuse

The routine already works until the day the source says it may not.

What feels good now

Today I keep a few minutes and avoid interrupting my default routine.

What the source says

The source summarizes the return this way: “If someone sends you an infringement notice with preliminary evidence, you must promptly delete, block, or remove the relevant content and forward the notice to the seller. Failing to act in time means you and the seller will be jointly liable for any additional losses incurred. After receiving the seller’s defense, forward it to the claimant and wait 15 days. If the claimant files no complaint or lawsuit during this period, you can restore the content.” Evidence grade A. The original states the population, caveats, and sources; this is not a personal forecast.

THE ENGLISH EDITION

Original recommendation and evidence

Source commit a994b6a0c905

9. Respond promptly to infringement notices; restore content after 15 days if no response

Cost: No cost involved. You must establish a fixed workflow: receive the notice, forward it to the seller, collect the seller’s defense arguments, and publicly disclose the final outcome. All steps must be documented.

In plain terms: If someone sends you an infringement notice with preliminary evidence, you must promptly delete, block, or remove the relevant content and forward the notice to the seller. Failing to act in time means you and the seller will be jointly liable for any additional losses incurred. After receiving the seller’s defense, forward it to the claimant and wait 15 days. If the claimant files no complaint or lawsuit during this period, you can restore the content.

Benefit: Rights holders are entitled to request e-commerce platforms to take necessary measures such as deleting, blocking, or removing links to infringing content, as well as terminating related transactions and services. Such notices must include preliminary evidence of infringement. Merely sending a generic statement is insufficient. Once a platform receives a valid notice, it must act promptly and forward the notice to the seller; failure to do so makes the platform jointly liable for any additional damages incurred. After a seller submits a defense, the platform must wait 15 days after forwarding the statement to the rights holder before lifting any measures, provided no complaint or lawsuit is filed. If a platform knows or should know of infringement yet fails to act, it will also bear joint liability with the seller. Regulatory authorities may also order the platform to make corrections within a set timeframe; failure to comply may result in fines ranging from 50,000 to 500,000 RMB for minor violations, and 500,000 to 2,000,000 RMB for serious cases. Conversely, if a party maliciously issues false notices causing losses to sellers, they must pay double the compensation owed (applies nationwide).

Evidence grade: A

Notes: If you operate a general website rather than a full e-commerce platform, you should follow the notice-and-takedown rules outlined in the Civil Code. The key difference lies in the waiting period after receiving a seller’s defense: the E-commerce Law specifies a mandatory 15-day window, while the Civil Code only requires a “reasonable timeframe.” Additionally, the E-commerce Law explicitly mandates that platforms disclose all received notices, seller defenses, and final resolutions to the public, as required under Article 44.

Sources: Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (2018). E-commerce Law (Articles 42, 43, 44, 45, 84). <https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=2c909fdd678bf17901678bf8af050b81>; National People's Congress (2020). Civil Code (Article 1195, Article 1,196, Article 1,197). <https://www.court.gov.cn/zixun/xiangqing/233181.html>

Read the complete Chinese source and notes

9. 接到侵权通知要及时处理,转送声明后 15 日没有下文就恢复

成本: 不花钱。要建一条固定流程:收到通知、转给卖家、收卖家的申辩、把结果公示出来。每一步都留档

说人话: 有人发来侵权通知,还附了初步证据,你要及时把东西删掉、屏蔽或者断开链接,同时把通知转给卖家。拖着不办,多出来的那部分损失你要和卖家一起赔。卖家申辩了,你把申辩转给对方,等 15 天。对方既没投诉也没起诉,就把东西恢复回去。

收益: 权利人「有权通知电子商务平台经营者采取删除、屏蔽、断开链接、终止交易和服务等必要措施。通知应当包括构成侵权的初步证据」。权利人就是商标、著作权、专利这些权利的主人。光发一句话不算,要附上初步证据。平台接到通知后,「应当及时采取必要措施,并将该通知转送平台内经营者;未及时采取必要措施的,对损害的扩大部分与平台内经营者承担连带责任」。你拖着不处理,多出来的那部分损失,你要和卖家一起赔。卖家申辩之后,平台「在转送声明到达知识产权权利人后十五日内,未收到权利人已经投诉或者起诉通知的,应当及时终止所采取的措施」。意思是把卖家的申辩转给权利人,等 15 天。对方既没投诉也没起诉,就把删掉、下架的恢复回去。平台知道或者应当知道有侵权却不处理的,与侵权人承担连带责任。知识产权部门还可以责令你限期改正,逾期不改的罚 5 万到 50 万元,情节严重的罚 50 万到 200 万元。反过来,「恶意发出错误通知,造成平台内经营者损失的,加倍承担赔偿责任」(全国)

证据等级: A

来源: 全国人大常委会 (2018). 电子商务法(第四十二、四十三、四十四、四十五、八十四条). <https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=2c909fdd678bf17901678bf8af050b81> ; 全国人大 (2020). 民法典(第一千一百九十五、一千一百九十六、一千一百九十七条). <https://www.court.gov.cn/zixun/xiangqing/233181.html>

备注: 你不是电商平台,只是一般网站,那就走民法典的通知删除规则。区别在于对方申辩之后你要等多久:电商法给了明确的 15 日,民法典只写「合理期限」。另外,把收到的通知、卖家的申辩和你的处理结果公示出来,是电商法第四十四条的明文要求。平台自己组织上传盗版,或者明知侵权还放着不管,「收到通知就删」这条规则护不住它,见第 9 节第 24 条(汉化漫画、搬运影视剧)

Author's scope notes: 你不是电商平台,只是一般网站,那就走民法典的通知删除规则。区别在于对方申辩之后你要等多久:电商法给了明确的 15 日,民法典只写「合理期限」。另外,把收到的通知、卖家的申辩和你的处理结果公示出来,是电商法第四十四条的明文要求。平台自己组织上传盗版,或者明知侵权还放着不管,「收到通知就删」这条规则护不住它,见第 9 节第 24 条(汉化漫画、搬运影视剧)

YOUR PRIVATE LIST

Choose what to do with this idea

Related source entries

Original content by eternity4719 under CC BY 4.0. English translation is credited in the source notes. HowToLiveWorse adds a clearly labeled satirical response.

Full source and adaptation notes