08-034 · EVIDENCE A · SOURCE-SENSITIVE
Insufficient evidence alone warrants acquittal; coerced confessions must be excluded; appeals and retrials remain possible after conviction
证据不足本来就应当判无罪,逼出来的口供应当排除;判了还有申诉和再审
Pursuing these procedures costs nothing in terms of fees, but appeals and retrials demand considerable time. Typically, hiring a lawyer is necessary, with fees starting at several thousand yuan. Those facing financial hardship may apply for legal aid — see Section 5 (“Hire a lawyer immediately after being charged”) for details. The real challenge lies in persisting through multiple rounds of proceedings without giving up.
The Criminal Procedure Law sets clear thresholds for conviction: evidence must be verified through legally prescribed procedures and must collectively leave no reasonable doubt about the facts. When these criteria cannot be met, acquittal is mandatory. Confessions extracted via torture or testimonies obtained through violence and threats must be excluded from consideration and cannot serve as a basis for sentencing. Once a verdict takes effect, the defendant, their legal representatives, and close relatives retain the right to file an appeal.
A
Move “Insufficient evidence alone warrants acquittal; coerced confessions must be excluded; appeals and retrials remain possible after conviction” to Future Me's calendar
The excuse
There is no immediate alarm, so the sensible choice can wait for a less busy week.
What feels good now
Today I keep a few minutes, a bit of persistence and avoid interrupting my default routine.
What the source says
The source summarizes the return this way: “The Criminal Procedure Law sets clear thresholds for conviction: evidence must be verified through legally prescribed procedures and must collectively leave no reasonable doubt about the facts. When these criteria cannot be met, acquittal is mandatory. Confessions extracted via torture or testimonies obtained through violence and threats must be excluded from consideration and cannot serve as a basis for sentencing. Once a verdict takes effect, the defendant, their legal representatives, and close relatives retain the right to file an appeal.” Evidence grade A. The original states the population, caveats, and sources; this is not a personal forecast.
Use the original facts and limits. For an urgent medical, safety, financial, or legal issue, contact a qualified local professional or service.
THE ENGLISH EDITION
Original recommendation and evidence
34. Insufficient evidence alone warrants acquittal; coerced confessions must be excluded; appeals and retrials remain possible after conviction
Cost: Pursuing these procedures costs nothing in terms of fees, but appeals and retrials demand considerable time. Typically, hiring a lawyer is necessary, with fees starting at several thousand yuan. Those facing financial hardship may apply for legal aid — see Section 5 (“Hire a lawyer immediately after being charged”) for details. The real challenge lies in persisting through multiple rounds of proceedings without giving up.
In plain terms: The Criminal Procedure Law sets clear thresholds for conviction: evidence must be verified through legally prescribed procedures and must collectively leave no reasonable doubt about the facts. When these criteria cannot be met, acquittal is mandatory. Confessions extracted via torture or testimonies obtained through violence and threats must be excluded from consideration and cannot serve as a basis for sentencing. Once a verdict takes effect, the defendant, their legal representatives, and close relatives retain the right to file an appeal.
Benefit: Article 55 of the Criminal Procedure Law stipulates that evidence must be both authentic and sufficient: it must be verified through legally prescribed procedures, and the totality of evidence must eliminate any reasonable doubt regarding the facts. Eliminating reasonable doubt means that, when all evidence is considered together, no other plausible explanation for those facts remains. Article 56 further states that any statements from suspects or defendants obtained through torture or any testimonies or victim statements gathered via violence or threats must be excluded from legal proceedings. Should such evidence be identified during investigation, prosecution, or trial, it must be discarded and cannot inform prosecution recommendations, decisions, or sentencing. Article 200(3) explicitly provides that when evidence proves insufficient to establish guilt, a verdict of acquittal must be rendered on the grounds that the alleged crime cannot be proven. Article 252 preserves the right to appeal: defendants, their legal representatives, and close relatives may petition courts or procuratorates against finalized judgments or rulings. However, filing an appeal does not suspend the execution of the original verdict; appeals and enforcement proceed independently. Article 253 enumerates circumstances under which courts are obligated to conduct a retrial nationwide.
Evidence grade: A
Sources: Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (2018). Criminal Procedure Law (2018 amendment, Articles 55, 56, 200, 252, 253). <https://www.spp.gov.cn/zdgz/201810/t20181027_396818.shtml>
Notes: These provisions represent minimum legal safeguards rather than guarantees of specific outcomes. No verifiable official statistics exist in China regarding acquittal rates in criminal cases or success rates for appeals and retrials, so no percentages or case-specific evaluations are provided here. Three concrete steps remain available to individuals: first, hire a lawyer immediately after the initial interrogation — see Section 5 (“Hire a lawyer immediately after being charged”) for guidance; second, carefully review and sign any official transcripts only after reading them in full; third, avoid admitting guilt to “get out sooner,” as pleading guilty and accepting punishment may earn leniency but does not grant immunity from liability. Where statutory conditions are met, courts are legally required to conduct a retrial.
Read the complete Chinese source and notes
34. 证据不足本来就应当判无罪,逼出来的口供应当排除;判了还有申诉和再审
成本: 走程序本身不花钱,但申诉和再审都很耗时间。通常要请律师,律师费几千元起。经济困难的可以申请法律援助,见本节第 5 条(被指控先请律师)。难在一轮轮等下去不放弃。
说人话: 定罪的门槛写在刑事诉讼法里:定案的证据要经过法定程序查证属实,还要综合全案证据排除合理怀疑。做不到,就应当判无罪。刑讯逼供得来的口供、暴力威胁得来的证言,都应当排除,不能作为判决的依据。判决生效之后,你和你的法定代理人、近亲属还可以申诉。
收益: 《刑事诉讼法》第五十五条:证据确实、充分,要符合这些条件——定案的证据都经过法定程序查证属实,综合全案证据对认定的事实已经排除合理怀疑。排除合理怀疑,就是把全案证据合起来看,认定的事实不能还留着说得通的另一种可能。第五十六条:采用刑讯逼供等非法方法收集的犯罪嫌疑人、被告人供述,以及采用暴力、威胁等非法方法收集的证人证言、被害人陈述,应当予以排除。在侦查、审查起诉、审判时发现有应当排除的证据的,应当依法予以排除,不得作为起诉意见、起诉决定和判决的依据。第二百条第(三)项:证据不足,不能认定被告人有罪的,应当作出证据不足、指控的犯罪不能成立的无罪判决。第二百五十二条给了申诉的路。当事人及其法定代理人、近亲属,对已经发生法律效力的判决、裁定,可以向人民法院或者人民检察院提出申诉。但申诉不能停止判决、裁定的执行。第二百五十三条列举了人民法院应当重新审判的情形(全国)
证据等级: A
来源: 全国人大常委会 (2018). 刑事诉讼法(2018 年修正,第五十五、五十六、二百、二百五十二、二百五十三条). <https://www.spp.gov.cn/zdgz/201810/t20181027_396818.shtml>
备注: 这些是制度写明的底线,结果并没有保证。本书没有中国刑事案件无罪率、申诉改判率的可核对官方数据,所以不写比例,也不评价个案。自己能做的有三件事。第一,第一次讯问之后就委托律师,见本节第 5 条(被指控先请律师)。第二,笔录逐字看完再签。第三,别为了「早点出去」认下没做过的事,认罪认罚只能从宽,免不了责。符合法定情形的,法院应当重新审判。
YOUR PRIVATE LIST