10-001 · EVIDENCE A · LOW-RISK READING

Getting to know more people rather than fixating on just one: You can’t predict compatibility before meeting someone

认识更多人,而不是死磕一个:两个人合不合得来,见面之前预测不出来

Source cost

No cost at all. Spend time getting to know several people instead of obsessing over just one. The hard part is resisting the urge to fixate on a single person.

Source return

Two speed-dating studies asked participants to fill out over 100 questionnaires about their preferences in a partner before any meetings took place. These questionnaires could only reveal how likely someone is to like others in general, and how popular they tend to be — they couldn’t predict whether two specific people would hit it off. Compatibility can only be determined by meeting in person. Therefore, it’s far more worthwhile to get to know multiple people than to bet everything on just one.

Evidence grade

A

THE LOW-ROI DETOURSatire, not advice

Move “Getting to know more people rather than fixating on just one: You can’t predict compatibility before meeting someone” to Future Me's calendar

The excuse

The routine already works until the day the source says it may not.

What feels good now

Today I keep a few minutes, a bit of persistence and avoid interrupting my default routine.

What the source says

The source summarizes the return this way: “Two speed-dating studies asked participants to fill out over 100 questionnaires about their preferences in a partner before any meetings took place. These questionnaires could only reveal how likely someone is to like others in general, and how popular they tend to be — they couldn’t predict whether two specific people would hit it off. Compatibility can only be determined by meeting in person. Therefore, it’s far more worthwhile to get to know multiple people than to bet everything on just one.” Evidence grade A. The original states the population, caveats, and sources; this is not a personal forecast.

THE ENGLISH EDITION

Original recommendation and evidence

Source commit a994b6a0c905

1. Getting to know more people rather than fixating on just one: You can’t predict compatibility before meeting someone

Cost: No cost at all. Spend time getting to know several people instead of obsessing over just one. The hard part is resisting the urge to fixate on a single person.

In plain terms: Two speed-dating studies asked participants to fill out over 100 questionnaires about their preferences in a partner before any meetings took place. These questionnaires could only reveal how likely someone is to like others in general, and how popular they tend to be — they couldn’t predict whether two specific people would hit it off. Compatibility can only be determined by meeting in person. Therefore, it’s far more worthwhile to get to know multiple people than to bet everything on just one.

Benefit: In both speed-dating studies, participants completed more than 100 self-report questionnaires related to partner preferences prior to meeting potential matches. Researchers then applied a random forest model — an algorithm designed to detect patterns — to analyze the data. This model could predict “how likely an individual is to like others overall,” with the questionnaires accounting for 4%–18% of the variance in such tendencies; this represents only a small fraction of the total differences between individuals. It could also predict “how popular an individual tends to be,” explaining 7%–27% of variance. However, it completely failed to predict whether two specific individuals would be compatible; no combination of pre-meeting traits or preferences could be used to forecast their mutual attraction. Earlier, the same research team conducted another speed-dating experiment where participants reported their own ideal preferences — whether they valued physical appearance or financial prospects more. Even this information couldn’t predict how interested they’d be in a particular person during the actual date.

Evidence grade: A

Sources: Joel S, Eastwick PW, Finkel EJ (2017). Is romantic desire predictable? Machine learning applied to initial romantic attraction. Psychological Science, 28(10), 1478-1489. <https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617714580>; Eastwick PW, Finkel EJ (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 245-264. <https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.245>

Notes: Both studies clearly state that compatibility cannot be predicted before meeting someone — they do not claim that all efforts to predict it are futile. Since true compatibility can only be determined by face-to-face interaction, it makes far more sense to invest time in meeting multiple people individually rather than placing all hopes on just one. Keep in mind that all study participants were university students from Western countries; China’s dating environment differs significantly, so these findings should be applied with some caution.

Read the complete Chinese source and notes

1. 认识更多人,而不是死磕一个:两个人合不合得来,见面之前预测不出来

成本: 不花钱。时间花在多认识几个人上,别反复琢磨同一个人。难在忍住不死磕。

说人话: 两场闪电约会研究让人在见面前填了 100 多项择偶问卷。问卷只能算出谁普遍容易喜欢别人、谁普遍受欢迎,算不出这两个人之间来不来电。合不合得来只有见了面才知道。所以多认识几个人,比押在一个人身上划算。

收益: 两场闪电约会研究里,参与者见面前先填了 100 多项与择偶有关的自陈量表(自己给自己打分的问卷)。研究者用随机森林模型(一种找规律的算法)来算。能算出「一个人整体上有多容易喜欢别人」,这些问卷能说明其中 4%–18% 的方差,方差就是人与人之间的差别,问卷只能说明其中一小部分。也能算出「一个人整体上有多受欢迎」,能说明 7%–27%。但「这两个具体的人之间来不来电」算不出来,会前的特质和偏好怎么组合都算不出来。同一批研究者更早还做过一项闪电约会实验。参与者会前自己报了理想型偏好,比如看重外貌还是看重经济前景。这个偏好预测不了他们在现场对具体某个人的兴趣

证据等级: A

来源: Joel S, Eastwick PW, Finkel EJ (2017). Is romantic desire predictable? Machine learning applied to initial romantic attraction. Psychological Science, 28(10), 1478-1489. <https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617714580>;Eastwick PW, Finkel EJ (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 245-264. <https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.245>

备注: 两项研究只说明「见面之前算不出来」,没说「怎么努力都没用」。合不合得来只能见了面才知道,所以把时间花在多认识几个人上,每个都真正见一面,比全押在一个人身上划算。研究对象都是欧美大学生。中国的婚恋环境不一样,套到自己身上要打折

Author's scope notes: 两项研究只说明「见面之前算不出来」,没说「怎么努力都没用」。合不合得来只能见了面才知道,所以把时间花在多认识几个人上,每个都真正见一面,比全押在一个人身上划算。研究对象都是欧美大学生。中国的婚恋环境不一样,套到自己身上要打折

YOUR PRIVATE LIST

Choose what to do with this idea

Original content by eternity4719 under CC BY 4.0. English translation is credited in the source notes. HowToLiveWorse adds a clearly labeled satirical response.

Full source and adaptation notes