12-011 · EVIDENCE A · SOURCE-SENSITIVE

The food industry faces criminal penalties: selling meat from diseased animals or products exceeding safety limits is already a crime; adding toxic or harmful non-food substances carries a minimum five-year sentence regardless of revenue

食品这一行有刑事线:卖病死肉、超标货就够罪,掺了有毒有害的不看金额、起刑五年

Source cost

No direct cost is involved. Follow the approach outlined in Article 8 (assess which regulatory category your operation falls under): retain all quarantine certificates and purchase receipts, and only use ingredients with verifiable approval numbers on their labels.

Source return

While earlier articles impose financial penalties, this one targets individuals criminally. Selling meat from diseased animals, meat failing inspection, or products with excessive pesticide, veterinary drug, or heavy metal residues is a crime as long as it is “sufficient” to cause serious poisoning — no actual victims are required, and offenders face up to three years in prison. Adding toxic or harmful non-food substances to food carries a minimum five-year sentence, irrespective of total sales volume.

Evidence grade

A

THE LOW-ROI DETOURSatire, not advice

Move “The food industry faces criminal penalties: selling meat from diseased animals or products exceeding safety limits is already a crime; adding toxic or harmful non-food substances carries a minimum five-year sentence regardless of revenue” to Future Me's calendar

The excuse

The routine already works until the day the source says it may not.

What feels good now

Today I keep a few minutes and avoid interrupting my default routine.

What the source says

The source summarizes the return this way: “While earlier articles impose financial penalties, this one targets individuals criminally. Selling meat from diseased animals, meat failing inspection, or products with excessive pesticide, veterinary drug, or heavy metal residues is a crime as long as it is “sufficient” to cause serious poisoning — no actual victims are required, and offenders face up to three years in prison. Adding toxic or harmful non-food substances to food carries a minimum five-year sentence, irrespective of total sales volume.” Evidence grade A. The original states the population, caveats, and sources; this is not a personal forecast.

THE ENGLISH EDITION

Original recommendation and evidence

Source commit a994b6a0c905

11. The food industry faces criminal penalties: selling meat from diseased animals or products exceeding safety limits is already a crime; adding toxic or harmful non-food substances carries a minimum five-year sentence regardless of revenue

Cost: No direct cost is involved. Follow the approach outlined in Article 8 (assess which regulatory category your operation falls under): retain all quarantine certificates and purchase receipts, and only use ingredients with verifiable approval numbers on their labels.

In plain terms: While earlier articles impose financial penalties, this one targets individuals criminally. Selling meat from diseased animals, meat failing inspection, or products with excessive pesticide, veterinary drug, or heavy metal residues is a crime as long as it is “sufficient” to cause serious poisoning — no actual victims are required, and offenders face up to three years in prison. Adding toxic or harmful non-food substances to food carries a minimum five-year sentence, irrespective of total sales volume.

Benefit: Article 143 of the Criminal Law governs this category: any food you produce or sell that fails to meet safety standards is illegal if it is “sufficient” to cause serious food poisoning or other severe foodborne illnesses. Offenders receive up to three years of imprisonment or detention plus fines. If serious health damage or other aggravating factors are present, sentences rise to three to seven years with additional fines. In cases of especially grave consequences, imprisonment ranges from seven years to life, plus asset confiscation or further fines. Article 144 covers the deliberate addition of toxic or harmful non-food substances to food; offenders face up to five years of imprisonment plus fines. If serious health damage or other serious circumstances arise, sentences increase to five to ten years with fines. If death results or other especially severe circumstances exist, penalties follow Article 141 (ten years or more, life imprisonment, or death). A joint interpretation by the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate defines four scenarios that qualify as “sufficient” to cause serious foodborne illness: presence of pathogenic microbes, pesticide residues, veterinary drug residues, biological toxins, or heavy metals exceeding legal limits; use of meat from diseased, undiagnosed, or unqualified animals; production or sale of items banned for public health reasons; and infant formula or medical foods with severely inadequate nutritional content. Excessive or improper use of additives that lead to such outcomes also falls under Article 143. What counts as “toxic or harmful non-food substances” is strictly defined: any substance prohibited by law or listed by government authorities (e.g., banned pesticides or drugs not approved for food animals). Additional serious circumstances under Article 144 include sales totaling between 100,000 and 200,000 RMB, operations near schools, nursing homes, or facilities serving minors or the elderly, or illegal private slaughtering without proper licensing; such acts may also incur penalties under the crime of illegal business operations. Revenue thresholds of 100,000 RMB or net profits of 50,000 RMB are considered “serious circumstances” nationwide.

Evidence grade: A

Sources: National People's Congress Standing Committee (amended in 2020). Criminal Law (Articles 141, 143, 144). <https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=ff808181796a636a0179822a19640c92> (National Laws and Regulations Database); Supreme People's Court of China, Supreme People's Procuratorate of China (2021). Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in Handling Criminal Cases Endangering Food Safety (Fashi [2021] No. 24, Articles 1, 2, 5, 7, 9, 17, and 18, effective from January 1, 2022). <https://scjg.hebei.gov.cn/info/79117> (Full text reproduced by Hebei Provincial Administration for Market Regulation), <https://sft.ln.gov.cn/sft/ywgz/zfflgw/xzys/2525860BD0F843EFA7A3B7FDC330614E/index.shtml> (The full text was reproduced by the Liaoning Provincial Department of Justice, and the two copies were verified verbatim for consistency)

Notes: The dividing line between this article and the previous three is whether food safety standards themselves are violated. Failure to obtain permits, incomplete labeling, or false health claims result in financial penalties, while selling diseased meat, non-compliant products, improper additives, or non-food substances triggers criminal prosecution. The simplest preventive measure remains the steps outlined in Article 8: purchase meat solely from licensed slaughterhouses, retain all quarantine and quality certificates, and use only ingredients with valid approval numbers. Unverified “discounted meat” or unknown “by‑product scraps” are common sources of violations. Due to a 502 error when retrieving the original Supreme People’s Court bulletin, two provincial official reprints were cross‑checked word‑for‑word to ensure accuracy.

Read the complete Chinese source and notes

11. 食品这一行有刑事线:卖病死肉、超标货就够罪,掺了有毒有害的不看金额、起刑五年

成本: 不花钱。按第 8 条(做食品先看自己落在哪一档)那套做:留好检疫证明和进货凭证,配料表里只放查得到批准文号的东西。

说人话: 前面几条罚的是钱,这条抓的是人。卖病死肉、检验不合格的肉,或者农残兽残重金属严重超标的东西,只要「足以」让人吃出严重中毒就够罪,不用真有人吃坏,判 3 年以下。往食品里掺有毒有害的非食品原料,起步就是 5 年以下,不看你卖了多少钱。

收益: 刑法第一百四十三条管的是这一档。你做的、卖的食品不符合食品安全标准。只要「足以造成严重食物中毒事故或者其他严重食源性疾病的」,就够罪。判 3 年以下有期徒刑或者拘役(短期关押),同时罚钱。把人的健康搞出严重损害,或者有其他严重情节的,判 3 年以上 7 年以下并罚钱。后果特别严重的,判 7 年以上有期徒刑直到无期,罚钱或者把名下财产全部没收。第一百四十四条:在做的、卖的食品里掺进有毒有害的非食品原料,或者明知掺了还卖的,判 5 年以下有期徒刑并罚钱。把人的健康搞出严重损害,或者有其他严重情节的,判 5 年以上 10 年以下并罚钱。把人吃死了,或者有其他特别严重情节的,按第一百四十一条处罚(10 年以上、无期或者死刑)。最高人民法院和最高人民检察院出过一份解释(两高解释)。它列明了哪几种情形算「足以造成严重食物中毒事故或者其他严重食源性疾病」。一是「含有严重超出标准限量的致病性微生物、农药残留、兽药残留、生物毒素、重金属等污染物质」。二是「属于病死、死因不明或者检验检疫不合格的畜、禽、兽、水产动物肉类及其制品的」。三是「属于国家为防控疾病等特殊需要明令禁止生产、销售的」。四是「特殊医学用途配方食品、专供婴幼儿的主辅食品营养成分严重不符合食品安全标准的」。添加剂用超量、用错地方,到了会造成上述后果的程度,同样按第一百四十三条定罪。什么算「有毒、有害的非食品原料」,不由你说了算。一类是法律法规禁止往食品里加的物质。另一类是国务院有关部门公告的名单上的物质,比如禁用农药、禁止用在食用动物身上的药。还有一种情形也算第一百四十四条里的「其他严重情节」。做了、卖了 10 万元以上不满 20 万元。地点在中小学校园、托幼机构、养老机构及周边。卖的对象是未成年人、老年人。不在指定屠宰厂、自己私设猪的屠宰场干屠宰和销售,情节严重的按非法经营罪判。做到 10 万元以上,或者挣到 5 万元以上,就算「情节严重」(全国)

证据等级: A

来源: 全国人大常委会 (2020 年修正). 刑法(第一百四十一、一百四十三、一百四十四条). <https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=ff808181796a636a0179822a19640c92>(国家法律法规数据库);最高人民法院、最高人民检察院 (2021). 关于办理危害食品安全刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释(法释〔2021〕24 号,第一、二、五、七、九、十七、十八条,2022 年 1 月 1 日起施行). <https://scjg.hebei.gov.cn/info/79117>(河北省市场监督管理局转载全文)、<https://sft.ln.gov.cn/sft/ywgz/zfflgw/xzys/2525860BD0F843EFA7A3B7FDC330614E/index.shtml>(辽宁省司法厅转载全文,两份逐字核对一致)

备注: 和前面三条的分界线是:有没有踩到食品安全本身。没办证、标签漏项、吹疗效,罚的是钱。卖病死肉、超标货、乱加添加剂、掺非食品原料,进的是刑事程序。最省事的防线还是第 8 条(做食品先看自己落在哪一档)里那套动作。肉只从定点屠宰厂进。每批留好检疫证明和肉品品质检验合格证。配料只用查得到批准文号的。所谓「便宜处理的肉」「不知道哪来的边角料」,最常出事。原始来源最高人民法院公报的页面本轮返回 502,所以引了两份省级官方转载,并且互相逐字核对过。

Author's scope notes: 和前面三条的分界线是:有没有踩到食品安全本身。没办证、标签漏项、吹疗效,罚的是钱。卖病死肉、超标货、乱加添加剂、掺非食品原料,进的是刑事程序。最省事的防线还是第 8 条(做食品先看自己落在哪一档)里那套动作。肉只从定点屠宰厂进。每批留好检疫证明和肉品品质检验合格证。配料只用查得到批准文号的。所谓「便宜处理的肉」「不知道哪来的边角料」,最常出事。原始来源最高人民法院公报的页面本轮返回 502,所以引了两份省级官方转载,并且互相逐字核对过。

YOUR PRIVATE LIST

Choose what to do with this idea

Original content by eternity4719 under CC BY 4.0. English translation is credited in the source notes. HowToLiveWorse adds a clearly labeled satirical response.

Full source and adaptation notes