18-004 · EVIDENCE C · LOW-RISK READING
The time-cost calculation is based on “whose time is being used,” not on “how hard it is”
时间账按「谁的时间被占掉」算,不按「辛不辛苦」算
There’s no monetary expense — only time is spent. For children under 3, that time is essentially taken up around the clock. The difficulty lies in the fact that this happens daily, not just for a few tough days.
Count up all the hours spent caring for the child each day, plus every nighttime wake-up call. Then multiply that total by the hourly wage of the person doing the work. The resulting figure is usually far higher than the cost of formula and diapers. That’s why it’s best to discuss how responsibilities will be divided before having a child.
C
Move “The time-cost calculation is based on “whose time is being used,” not on “how hard it is”” to Future Me's calendar
The excuse
I can spend longer deciding whether to start than the small action would take.
What feels good now
Today I keep a few minutes, a bit of persistence and avoid interrupting my default routine.
What the source says
The source summarizes the return this way: “Count up all the hours spent caring for the child each day, plus every nighttime wake-up call. Then multiply that total by the hourly wage of the person doing the work. The resulting figure is usually far higher than the cost of formula and diapers. That’s why it’s best to discuss how responsibilities will be divided before having a child.” Evidence grade C. The original states the population, caveats, and sources; this is not a personal forecast.
Open the original entry, check who the evidence applies to, then pick one small step that fits.
THE ENGLISH EDITION
Original recommendation and evidence
4. The time-cost calculation is based on “whose time is being used,” not on “how hard it is”
Cost: There’s no monetary expense — only time is spent. For children under 3, that time is essentially taken up around the clock. The difficulty lies in the fact that this happens daily, not just for a few tough days.
In plain terms: Count up all the hours spent caring for the child each day, plus every nighttime wake-up call. Then multiply that total by the hourly wage of the person doing the work. The resulting figure is usually far higher than the cost of formula and diapers. That’s why it’s best to discuss how responsibilities will be divided before having a child.
Benefit: By converting daily childcare time and nighttime interruptions into hours, then multiplying by the caregiver’s hourly wage, you arrive at a number that typically exceeds the cost of formula and diapers. Even unpaid tasks like childcare, cooking, and nightly wake-ups should be treated the same way — converted to hours and multiplied by a wage figure to be included in the total cost. The calculation method mirrors that used in Section 10 for household chores. Having a clear division of labor agreed upon beforehand makes it easier to decide whether to have a child.
Evidence grade: C
Notes: The goal isn’t to produce a perfectly accurate figure. Rather, it’s to ensure both partners discuss responsibilities using the same calculation framework prior to having a child, rather than arguing about it afterward.
Sources: Author’s experience, no direct literature; see Section 10 for caliber
Source links
- 作者经验,无直接文献
- 口径见第 10 节
- Pinned original chapter on GitHub ↗
Read the complete Chinese source and notes
4. 时间账按「谁的时间被占掉」算,不按「辛不辛苦」算
成本: 不花钱,花的是时间。孩子 3 岁前基本是全天被占住。难在天天如此,没法咬牙几天就过去
说人话: 把每天看孩子的小时数、夜里被吵醒的次数,都折算成时间。再乘上干这些活的那个人的时薪。算出来的数,一般远远大于奶粉尿布钱。所以分工最好在生之前就谈好。
收益: 把每天照看孩子的时间、夜里被吵醒的次数,都折算成小时。再乘以干这些活的那个人的时薪。得到的数字通常远大于奶粉尿布钱。照看、做饭、夜里起夜这些活虽然没人付钱,也照这样记进成本。算法和第 10 节算家务的那套一样。先谈好分工,再决定生不生
证据等级: C
来源: 作者经验,无直接文献;口径见第 10 节
备注: 数字不必算得很准。有用的是两个人在生之前对着同一张表谈分工,免得生完再吵
YOUR PRIVATE LIST