23-014 · EVIDENCE A · LOW-RISK READING
After studying, close the book and test yourself — don’t just reread it.
学完先合上书自己考一遍,别回头重读
There’s no cost involved, and no extra time is needed. Use the time you’d otherwise spend rereading to write down or answer questions from memory instead. The difficulty lies in how uncomfortable it feels to confront what you’ve forgotten right away, compared to the relative ease of rereading.
Rereading a section often makes it seem very familiar, but that doesn’t mean you’ve actually retained it well. Testing yourself after reading yields noticeably better results. In classrooms where brief quizzes are added, average test scores rise by a moderate amount. When ranking ten common study methods, self-testing comes out on top. After finishing a section, try writing down the key points from memory before checking them against the text.
A
Move “After studying, close the book and test yourself — don’t just reread it.” to Future Me's calendar
The excuse
I can spend longer deciding whether to start than the small action would take.
What feels good now
Today I keep a few minutes, a bit of persistence and avoid interrupting my default routine.
What the source says
The source summarizes the return this way: “Rereading a section often makes it seem very familiar, but that doesn’t mean you’ve actually retained it well. Testing yourself after reading yields noticeably better results. In classrooms where brief quizzes are added, average test scores rise by a moderate amount. When ranking ten common study methods, self-testing comes out on top. After finishing a section, try writing down the key points from memory before checking them against the text.” Evidence grade A. The original states the population, caveats, and sources; this is not a personal forecast.
Open the original entry, check who the evidence applies to, then pick one small step that fits.
THE ENGLISH EDITION
Original recommendation and evidence
14. After studying, close the book and test yourself — don’t just reread it.
Cost: There’s no cost involved, and no extra time is needed. Use the time you’d otherwise spend rereading to write down or answer questions from memory instead. The difficulty lies in how uncomfortable it feels to confront what you’ve forgotten right away, compared to the relative ease of rereading.
In plain terms: Rereading a section often makes it seem very familiar, but that doesn’t mean you’ve actually retained it well. Testing yourself after reading yields noticeably better results. In classrooms where brief quizzes are added, average test scores rise by a moderate amount. When ranking ten common study methods, self-testing comes out on top. After finishing a section, try writing down the key points from memory before checking them against the text.
Benefit: A meta-analysis of 222 separate studies involving 48478 students found that classroom quizzes led to a moderate improvement in academic performance (effect size g = 0.499). This effect varies depending on several factors: the baseline study method used in the control group, how closely the quiz format matches the final exam, whether the material is comparable, whether corrective feedback is provided, how many times the quiz is administered, when and where it takes place, how long the intervention lasts, and the experimental design used. Another comprehensive review that evaluated all ten widely used study techniques rated “practice testing” and “spaced practice” as the most effective methods overall. Their high utility stems from proven success across learners of different ages and abilities, as well as in diverse testing formats and real-world educational settings.
Evidence grade: A
Sources: Yang C, Luo L, Vadillo MA, Yu R, Shanks DR (2021). Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 147(4), 399–435. <https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000309>; Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT (2013). Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. <https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266>
Notes: Self-testing is meant to force information out of your memory, not to assign grades. The recommended approach is to write down key points from memory after reading a section, then check them against the text. Providing corrective feedback further boosts effectiveness, so it’s important to carefully review why each answer was incorrect. The “large” magnitude of benefit mentioned here is determined by both the effect size and the overall rating. Since these studies measured academic outcomes rather than time saved, they weren’t evaluated against time‑saving thresholds. Self-testing and the method described in item 15 — spreading the same amount of study time across several days — are the two highest‑rated strategies identified in the same review; using them together yields the best results.
Source links
- Yang C, Luo L, Vadillo MA, Yu R, Shanks DR (2021). Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 147(4), 399–435. ↗
- Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT (2013). Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. ↗
- Pinned original chapter on GitHub ↗
Read the complete Chinese source and notes
14. 学完先合上书自己考一遍,别回头重读
成本: 不花钱,总时间也不用增加。把原来用来重读的那段时间,改成合上书默写或者做题。难在自测当场就把没记住的暴露出来,感觉比重读难受。
说人话: 读完再读一遍感觉很熟,其实记不牢。合上书考自己一遍,效果明显更好,课堂上加了小测验,成绩提高属于中等幅度。给十种常用学法排名时,自测排在最高一档。读完一节先默写要点,再翻回去对。
收益: 222 项独立研究、48478 名学生的荟萃分析:课堂测验让学生的学业成绩提高,效应量属于中等(g = 0.499)。效果大小受几个条件影响:对照组用的是什么学法、测验形式和最终考试是否一致、材料是否匹配、有没有给纠正性反馈、测验重复了几次、在哪里什么时候测、干预持续多久、用的是什么实验设计。另一份逐一评估十种常用学习方法的综述,把「练习性测验」和「分散练习」评为最高一档(high utility),理由是它们对不同年龄、不同能力的学习者都有效,在多种考核形式和真实教育场景里都被验证过。
证据等级: A
来源: Yang C, Luo L, Vadillo MA, Yu R, Shanks DR (2021). Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 147(4), 399–435. <https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000309>;Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT (2013). Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. <https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266>
备注: 自测是为了逼着把东西从脑子里调出来,不为打分。做法:读完一节合上书先默写要点,再翻回去对。有纠正性反馈的效果更好,所以对完答案要看清错在哪。收益量级记「大」,是按效应量和评级判的。这两份证据量的是成绩,没有量小时数,所以没按节省时间的阈值套。自测和第 15 条(把同样的时间摊到几天)是同一份综述里评级最高的两样,配合用。
YOUR PRIVATE LIST