30-018 · EVIDENCE C · SOURCE-SENSITIVE
Do not send a child to a closed boot camp to stop internet use through harmful confinement or punishment
别把孩子送进封闭管理的「戒网瘾学校」「特训营」：法律禁止用伤害身心的办法戒网瘾，已经有孩子被关死
Avoiding an unverified program costs nothing and avoids tuition; finding appropriate support takes time.
Mainland China's Minors Protection Law prohibits methods that harm a child's physical or mental health. The source documents court cases involving serious abuse and criminal convictions at training schools.
C
Move “Do not send a child to a closed boot camp to stop internet use through harmful confinement or punishment” to Future Me's calendar
The excuse
There is no immediate alarm, so the sensible choice can wait for a less busy week.
What feels good now
Today I keep a few minutes, a bit of persistence and avoid interrupting my default routine.
What the source says
The source summarizes the return this way: “Mainland China's Minors Protection Law prohibits methods that harm a child's physical or mental health. The source documents court cases involving serious abuse and criminal convictions at training schools.” Evidence grade C. The original states the population, caveats, and sources; this is not a personal forecast.
Use the original facts and limits. For an urgent medical, safety, financial, or legal issue, contact a qualified local professional or service.
THE ENGLISH EDITION
Original recommendation and evidence
18. Do not send a child to a closed boot camp to stop internet use through harmful confinement or punishment
Cost: Avoiding an unverified program costs nothing and avoids tuition; finding appropriate support takes time.
In plain terms: Mainland China's Minors Protection Law prohibits methods that harm a child's physical or mental health. The source documents court cases involving serious abuse and criminal convictions at training schools.
Applicability and limits: The source recommends bringing an already-confined child home and seeking appropriate medical or child-protection help if abuse is reported. This is not a substitute for local legal or clinical support.
Translation note: This concise English edition was prepared for this site; the full Chinese source and its original evidence remain available below.
Read the complete Chinese source and notes
18. 别把孩子送进封闭管理的「戒网瘾学校」「特训营」：法律禁止用伤害身心的办法戒网瘾，已经有孩子被关死
成本: 不花钱，还省下一笔学费。难在孩子闹得最凶的时候，家长忍住不把他交给外人「封闭管教」。
说人话: 法律明文禁止用伤害孩子身心的办法戒网瘾。合肥一所特训学校把刚送去的男孩铐在禁闭室里，约 44 个小时后人就死了。南昌豫章书院把学生关禁闭，几个负责人被判了刑，家长要求赔学费，法院没支持。
收益: 《未成年人保护法》第六十八条规定，任何组织和个人不得用侵害未成年人身心健康的方式，干预未成年人沉迷网络。下面两起案子都有法院判决。第一起在安徽合肥。2017 年 8 月，一名 18 岁男孩的父母和一家特训学校签了协议，要送他戒网瘾。学校的人把他强行带走，关进禁闭室，把他的双手铐在窗户栅栏上。他们限制他吃饭、喝水和休息，还打了他。约 44 个小时后，男孩死亡。鉴定结论是高温、限制体位、缺少饮食和外伤，引起水电解质紊乱死亡。2018 年 10 月 31 日，合肥市中级法院一审判决。学校负责人犯故意伤害罪和非法拘禁罪，判 16 年。四名教官判 1 年到 8 年 6 个月。2018 年 12 月 28 日，安徽省高级法院二审维持原判。二审裁定写明，这所学校没有经过有关部门批准，几名被告人也都没有教师资质。第二起在江西南昌。豫章书院 2013 年开办，2017 年 11 月注销停办。办学期间，学校把部分学生带进「烦闷解脱室」关禁闭，派专人看守，每次关三到十天。2023 年 4 月 28 日，萍乡市安源区法院重审一审宣判，五名被告人构成非法拘禁罪。四人判二年十个月到十一个月，并在一定期限内禁止从事和教育有关的职业，一人免予刑事处罚。家长要求赔学费和往返交通费，法院不支持（全国 / 安徽 / 江西）
证据等级: C
来源: 全国人大常委会 (2024 年修正). 未成年人保护法（第六十八条）. <https://flk.npc.gov.cn/detail?id=ff8081818f197cf001905e567af635a0>；红星新闻 (2019-02-20). 追热点·18岁少年被铐着关禁闭两天死亡，戒网瘾学校5人获刑. <https://static.cdsb.com/micropub/Articles/201902/5b98283216ea5d2e8eef7f8cb7d4dbbb.html>（网页存档 <https://web.archive.org/web/20261005013030/https://static.cdsb.com/micropub/Articles/201902/5b98283216ea5d2e8eef7f8cb7d4dbbb.html>）；新华社 (2023-04-28). 江西“豫章书院案”宣判 5名被告均服判不上诉. <http://www.news.cn/2023-04/28/c_1129579126.htm>（网页存档 <http://web.archive.org/web/20230428212544/http://www.news.cn/2023-04/28/c_1129579126.htm>）
备注: 给 C 是因为只有个案，没有这类学校出事多少的统计。合肥那起只有媒体报道，报道引用了一审判决书和二审裁定书，法院官网上没找到判决原文。豫章书院那起是新华社报道的法院宣判。孩子爱打游戏，先按本节第 14 条（孩子爱打游戏）看睡觉、作业和出门活动有没有被挤掉。成绩、睡觉、家里关系一起垮了，劝也停不下来，带孩子去精神科或儿童心理科，由医生诊断再治。已经送进去的，把孩子接回来。孩子说被关、被打，报警。受益人是孩子。
YOUR PRIVATE LIST