23-006 · EVIDENCE B · LOW-RISK READING

Treating “work now or study further” as a calculation: the three years of early earnings versus decades of future income

把「读书还是打工」算成一道题:早挣的三年工资,对上往后几十年的年收入差

Source cost

There is no monetary cost. Setting aside about half an hour to do the math is all it takes.

Source return

Lay both options side by side on paper. Working early yields only three years of wages from low‑skill jobs. Continuing education, on the other hand, delivers extra yearly earnings for the next three or four decades. In Chinese cities, each additional year of schooling raises average income by roughly 4.0% (in 1988) up to 10.2% (in 2001). These figures are somewhat dated and should be viewed only as rough estimates.

Evidence grade

B

THE LOW-ROI DETOURSatire, not advice

Move “Treating “work now or study further” as a calculation: the three years of early earnings versus decades of future income” to Future Me's calendar

The excuse

If I do not open the notes, no new task has technically appeared.

What feels good now

Today I keep a few minutes and avoid interrupting my default routine.

What the source says

The source summarizes the return this way: “Lay both options side by side on paper. Working early yields only three years of wages from low‑skill jobs. Continuing education, on the other hand, delivers extra yearly earnings for the next three or four decades. In Chinese cities, each additional year of schooling raises average income by roughly 4.0% (in 1988) up to 10.2% (in 2001). These figures are somewhat dated and should be viewed only as rough estimates.” Evidence grade B. The original states the population, caveats, and sources; this is not a personal forecast.

THE ENGLISH EDITION

Original recommendation and evidence

Source commit a994b6a0c905

6. Treating “work now or study further” as a calculation: the three years of early earnings versus decades of future income

Cost: There is no monetary cost. Setting aside about half an hour to do the math is all it takes.

In plain terms: Lay both options side by side on paper. Working early yields only three years of wages from low‑skill jobs. Continuing education, on the other hand, delivers extra yearly earnings for the next three or four decades. In Chinese cities, each additional year of schooling raises average income by roughly 4.0% (in 1988) up to 10.2% (in 2001). These figures are somewhat dated and should be viewed only as rough estimates.

Benefit: This estimate applies to Chinese urban areas between 1988 and 2001. The percentage increase in income linked to one extra year of schooling is known as the return on education. The original text notes that this rate rose sharply from 4.0% per year in 1988 to 10.2% in 2001, especially after 1992. It reflects the growing wage premium enjoyed by university graduates compared with those without higher education. This figure offers a locally relevant benchmark for converting “one extra year of study” into an expected lifetime income gain. For a global average, see Section 7 of this chapter (global average return on an extra year of schooling).

Evidence grade: B

Sources: Zhang J, Zhao Y, Park A, Song X (2005). Economic returns to schooling in urban China, 1988 to 2001. Journal of Comparative Economics, 33(4), 730-752. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2005.05.008>

Notes: Before performing the calculation, subtract the tuition waivers and grants mentioned in Section 4 (vocational school costs and aid), as well as the mortality impact discussed in Section 2 (extra year of schooling and mortality). The data end at 2001 and cover only urban residents, so they cannot be directly applied to today’s situation; the same caveat applies to the 9% global average cited in Section 7. Results will naturally vary from person to person. For individuals facing high tuition fees, mismatched majors or occupations, or lengthy study periods, the net benefit may indeed be negative — but this only indicates that that particular path is unwise, not that education as a whole is worthless. Several factors cannot be captured by the formula: legally mandated educational requirements (see Section 5 on integrated vocational admissions and separate exams), resistance to automation (see Section 10 on selecting automation‑resistant skills), and the possibility of switching careers. Ultimately, the benefits accrue to the individual.

Read the complete Chinese source and notes

6. 把「读书还是打工」算成一道题:早挣的三年工资,对上往后几十年的年收入差

成本: 不花钱。坐下来算一次,大概半小时。

说人话: 把两种选择摊在纸上比。早工作挣到的是三年低门槛岗位的工资,只有这一次。继续读,换回的是往后每年多挣的那一截,还要乘以剩下的三四十年。中国城镇多读一年书,收入平均高 4.0%(1988 年)到 10.2%(2001 年)。数据老,只能看个大概。

收益: 这是对中国城镇 1988 至 2001 年的估计。多读一年书能让收入高出多少,这叫教育回报率。原文写的是「从 1988 年每受教育一年 4.0% 大幅上升到 2001 年的 10.2%」。涨幅主要发生在 1992 年之后。它反映的是念到大学的人比没念的多挣的那一截(高等教育工资溢价)在变大。这是把「多读一年」折成年收入差时可用的中国本土量级。全球平均值见本节第 7 条(多受一年教育的全球平均回报)

证据等级: B

来源: Zhang J, Zhao Y, Park A, Song X (2005). Economic returns to schooling in urban China, 1988 to 2001. Journal of Comparative Economics, 33(4), 730-752. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2005.05.008>

备注: 算之前先扣掉本节第 4 条(中职学费和助学金)那些免学费和助学金,另外还有本节第 2 条(多受一年教育和死亡率)那笔账。数据截至 2001 年,只覆盖城镇,不能直接当今天的数用。本节第 7 条那个全球平均 9% 也一样。真按这个方法算,结论会因人而异。学费高、专业和岗位对不上、读的年限又长的,算出来可能真不划算,但那只说明这个具体项目不划算,说明不了读书无用。还有几项进不了公式:法定的学历门槛,见本节第 5 条(中职的贯通招生和单独考试);抗替代能力,见第 10 条(挑抗自动化的技能);能不能换行业。受益人是自己

Author's scope notes: 算之前先扣掉本节第 4 条(中职学费和助学金)那些免学费和助学金,另外还有本节第 2 条(多受一年教育和死亡率)那笔账。数据截至 2001 年,只覆盖城镇,不能直接当今天的数用。本节第 7 条那个全球平均 9% 也一样。真按这个方法算,结论会因人而异。学费高、专业和岗位对不上、读的年限又长的,算出来可能真不划算,但那只说明这个具体项目不划算,说明不了读书无用。还有几项进不了公式:法定的学历门槛,见本节第 5 条(中职的贯通招生和单独考试);抗替代能力,见第 10 条(挑抗自动化的技能);能不能换行业。受益人是自己

YOUR PRIVATE LIST

Choose what to do with this idea

Related source entries

Original content by eternity4719 under CC BY 4.0. English translation is credited in the source notes. HowToLiveWorse adds a clearly labeled satirical response.

Full source and adaptation notes