23-016 · EVIDENCE A · LOW-RISK READING

Don’t treat highlighting, rereading, and summarizing as primary study methods

别把划重点、反复读、写摘要当成主要学法

Source cost

No cost at all; actually saves time. These methods are easy to apply and give you that “I’m studying” feeling.

Source return

Highlighting and rereading are the most common study habits among students, yet both rank at the very bottom among ten widely used learning strategies. Summarizing, keyword memorization, and visualizing text with images also fall into the lowest tier. They’re not completely useless, but only work under very specific conditions, so spending the same amount of time on self-testing yields far better results.

Evidence grade

A

THE LOW-ROI DETOURSatire, not advice

Move “Don’t treat highlighting, rereading, and summarizing as primary study methods” to Future Me's calendar

The excuse

There is no immediate alarm, so the sensible choice can wait for a less busy week.

What feels good now

Today I keep a few minutes, a bit of persistence and avoid interrupting my default routine.

What the source says

The source summarizes the return this way: “Highlighting and rereading are the most common study habits among students, yet both rank at the very bottom among ten widely used learning strategies. Summarizing, keyword memorization, and visualizing text with images also fall into the lowest tier. They’re not completely useless, but only work under very specific conditions, so spending the same amount of time on self-testing yields far better results.” Evidence grade A. The original states the population, caveats, and sources; this is not a personal forecast.

THE ENGLISH EDITION

Original recommendation and evidence

Source commit a994b6a0c905

16. Don’t treat highlighting, rereading, and summarizing as primary study methods

Cost: No cost at all; actually saves time. These methods are easy to apply and give you that “I’m studying” feeling.

In plain terms: Highlighting and rereading are the most common study habits among students, yet both rank at the very bottom among ten widely used learning strategies. Summarizing, keyword memorization, and visualizing text with images also fall into the lowest tier. They’re not completely useless, but only work under very specific conditions, so spending the same amount of time on self-testing yields far better results.

Benefit: This review evaluates ten common study methods based on how well their effectiveness holds across different learning contexts, student traits, materials, and assessment formats. The highest-rated strategies are practice testing and spaced practice. Methods rated as moderately effective include elaborative questioning, self-explanation, and interleaved practice. The five least effective methods are summarizing, highlighting (or underlining), keyword memorization, visualizing text with images, and rereading. The review also notes that while most students report using rereading and highlighting, these methods do not reliably improve academic performance; they should be replaced with other approaches such as practice testing instead of rereading.

Evidence grade: A

Sources: Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT (2013). Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. <https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266>

Notes: You can use highlighting to mark sections you plan to self-test later, but the problem arises when highlighting itself is mistaken for actual learning. The review also clarifies that being in the lowest tier does not mean these methods have zero value — they simply work only under narrow circumstances and require further research. For alternative study actions, see item 14 (self-testing after closing the book) and item 15 (spreading study time across multiple days).

Read the complete Chinese source and notes

16. 别把划重点、反复读、写摘要当成主要学法

成本: 不花钱,反而省时间。难在这几样做起来最顺手,也最有「我在学习」的感觉。

说人话: 学生最常用的是划重点和反复读,可在十种常用学法的排名里,这两样都在最低一档。写摘要、关键词记忆法、给课文配图想象也在最低一档。它们不是完全没用,只是起作用的条件太窄,同样的时间换成自测更划算。

收益: 一份评估十种常用学习方法的综述,按「效果能不能跨学习条件、跨学生特征、跨材料、跨考核形式推广」给评级。评为最高一档的是练习性测验和分散练习。评为中等一档的是精细提问、自我解释、交错练习。评为最低一档的五种是:写摘要、划重点(或者画线)、关键词记忆法、为课文配图想象、反复阅读。综述写明:多数学生都说自己在用反复阅读和划重点,但这两种并不能稳定提高成绩,应当换成别的方法,比如用练习性测验代替反复阅读。

证据等级: A

来源: Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT (2013). Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. <https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266>

备注: 划线可以用来「标出一会儿要自测哪几处」,出问题的是把划线本身当成学习。综述也说明,最低一档不等于零,只是能起作用的条件窄、还需要更多研究。替代动作见第 14 条(合上书自测)和第 15 条(把同样的时间摊到几天)。

Author's scope notes: 划线可以用来「标出一会儿要自测哪几处」,出问题的是把划线本身当成学习。综述也说明,最低一档不等于零,只是能起作用的条件窄、还需要更多研究。替代动作见第 14 条(合上书自测)和第 15 条(把同样的时间摊到几天)。

YOUR PRIVATE LIST

Choose what to do with this idea

Related source entries

Original content by eternity4719 under CC BY 4.0. English translation is credited in the source notes. HowToLiveWorse adds a clearly labeled satirical response.

Full source and adaptation notes